evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

TecMinho — University of Minho's Knowledge and Technology Transfer Office

Portugal · Braga · See the Portugal profile

Top 54% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 1990, TecMinho — University of Minho's private not-for-profit interface body — has brokered 618 industry R&D contracts, filed 358 patent applications and helped launch 138 university start-ups, while training over 46,800 people.

Details

Promoter
University of Minho / TecMinho
Period
1990–present
Keywords
higher education, technology transfer, entrepreneurship, industrial R&D

Description

TecMinho was founded in 1990 as a private not-for-profit association acting as the University of Minho's interface with industry, organised into three units: Technology Transfer, Continuing Education, and Entrepreneurship. A 2009 WIPO presentation by its then-director corroborates this founding date and structure, describing TecMinho as University of Minho's dedicated Tech Transfer Office.

According to TecMinho's own "Facts and Numbers" page, cumulative results for 1990–2023 include 618 industry R&D contracts, 348 technologies promoted domestically and internationally, 358 patent applications, and 138 university start-ups supported. Over the same period the office delivered 3,182 training actions to 46,849 trainees drawn from 2,003 partner organisations, and took part in 77 transnational projects.

TecMinho pioneered university knowledge transfer in Portugal, predating the country's later policy push for such offices, and its annual SpinUM business-idea competition continues to seed new spin-offs (2023 winners: Screen4Health, Move+ and CodArte). These figures are institutional self-reported cumulative totals rather than an independent, counterfactual impact evaluation, so they should be read as evidence of sustained operational scale rather than a rigorously measured economic effect.

Read the full analysis: https://www.tecminho.uminho.pt/tecminho/factos-e-numeros

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful