evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

The Burren Programme — Results-Based Payments for Farmland Biodiversity

Ireland · Ballyvaughan · See the Ireland profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 40% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

From 2010–2022, Ireland's Burren Programme paid 328 farmers across 23,000 ha of karst grassland by ecological scorecard rather than prescription; independent evaluation found average field scores rose from 6.61 to 7.43 (2010–2019), worth an estimated €32.8M.

23,000 hectares
Farmland covered (by 2022)
328 farms
Participating farms (by 2022)
6.61 score (0-10)
Average ecological field score, start (2010)
7.43 score (0-10)
Average ecological field score, end (2019)
32.8 EUR million
Estimated monetised habitat/landscape value (2010-2022)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Burren Programme (successor to BurrenLIFE), Ireland's National Parks and Wildlife Service, EU LIFE programme
Period
2010–2022 (superseded nationally by ACRES / Burren & Aran)
Keywords
agri-environment, results-based payments, karst grassland biodiversity, high nature value farming, grazing management

Context

The Burren, a limestone karst landscape in County Clare, Ireland, supports internationally rare calcareous grassland flora that depends on traditional, low-intensity cattle grazing. The Burren Programme, successor to the EU LIFE-funded BurrenLIFE project, ran from 2010 to 2022 to keep that grazing economically viable for farmers.

Activities

Rather than paying for prescribed actions, the programme scored each field from 0 to 10 on an ecological 'scorecard' — assessing vegetation quality, scrub encroachment, grazing evidence and water-quality indicators — and paid farmers according to the outcome delivered. It also co-funded 'action-based' payments for specific conservation works such as scrub clearance, water trough installation and traditional wall repair.

Results

By 2022 the programme covered 23,000 hectares across 328 farms. A government-commissioned evaluation, together with peer-reviewed tracking of a 147-farm subset, found average field scores rose from 6.61 in 2010 to 7.43 in 2019; Ireland's National Parks and Wildlife Service estimated the monetised value of the resulting habitat and landscape improvement at EUR 32.8 million over the decade.

Conclusions

The scorecard methodology was written up as a guidance handbook for the European Commission's DG Environment on designing results-based agri-environment payments, and directly informed Ireland's national ACRES scheme (2023-), alongside sister results-based projects that now cover thousands of farmers nationally. Peer-reviewed literature cautions that, because payments follow a self-reported and verified score rather than a randomised control design, there is a possible 'lack of additionality' — some farmers may have enrolled with land that already scored well, making the measured gain harder to attribute solely to the scheme.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — NPWS estimated the monetised value of habitat and landscape improvement at EUR 32.8 million over 2010-2022; direct programme payment costs are not separately stated in available sources.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Twelve-year programme (2010-2022), superseded nationally by Ireland's ACRES scheme (2023-).
Staffing & skills
Burren Programme team (successor to BurrenLIFE), Ireland's National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS), EU LIFE programme, predecessor project funder

Conditions for success

  • Outcome-based scorecard payments rather than prescribed-action payments, aligning farmer incentives with ecological results
  • Combination of results-based and action-based (capital works) payments
  • Independent government and peer-reviewed evaluation building a credible evidence base
  • Codification into an EU DG Environment guidance handbook enabling adoption by Ireland's national ACRES scheme

Common failure modes

  • Because payments follow a self-reported and verified score rather than a randomised control design, peer-reviewed literature flags a possible lack of additionality
  • Some farmers may have enrolled with land that already scored well, complicating attribution of the measured gain solely to the scheme

Where it fits

Governance type
national government agri-environment scheme, EU LIFE-derived methodology
Scale
regional (Burren karst landscape, County Clare)
Income level
high-income (EU member state)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful