evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Trees Outside Woodlands Miyawaki Trial — 16 Paired Urban Plots in England, 79% vs 47% Survival Through the 2022 Drought

United Kingdom · Maidstone · See the United Kingdom profile

Top 89% 27/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

UK-funded paired trial of Miyawaki dense native planting on 16 poor-soil urban sites: 79% survival vs 47% for standard planting through the 2022 drought, ~GBP 10 vs 50 per surviving tree; ~3.5-year data, no biodiversity or carbon metrics.

Trees Outside Woodlands Miyawaki Trial — 16 Paired Urban Plots in England, 79% vs 47% Survival Through the 2022 Drought

Details

Promoter
Kent County Council / The Tree Council / Natural England / Defra
Period
2020–2025
Keywords
urban forestry, tree establishment, Miyawaki, nature-based solutions

Description

Between October 2020 and 2025 the UK Government-funded Trees Outside Woodlands programme (GBP 4.8m, Shared Outcomes Fund; delivered by The Tree Council, Natural England, Defra and five local authorities) tested the Miyawaki method of dense, mixed native planting in aerated, enriched soil on 16 urban sites across four English local authorities, including Kent. Sites were chosen because earlier conventional planting had failed or soils were poor.
Each Miyawaki plot was paired with a comparison plot using standard practice, the same species mix from the same nurseries and equal maintenance for the first three years. The July 2024 report 'Urban Tree Establishment' and a Natural England blog (Sept 2024) record average survival of 79% in Miyawaki plots versus 47% in comparison plots, measured through the summer 2022 drought, and a median cost of about GBP 10 per surviving tree versus about GBP 50 for standard planting, even though Miyawaki needs roughly three times as many trees up front. After about 3.5 years the plots form dense early-successional thickets, with the tallest trees around 4.5 m.
Limits: monitoring covers only ~3.5 years; plots are small and may self-thin to a few mature trees; wildlife benefits are described qualitatively, with no quantified biodiversity, carbon, cooling or water data; the plot-level methods are not independently peer reviewed. The programme is now testing which individual Miyawaki elements can be dropped to cut cost and soil disturbance.

Read the full analysis: https://naturalengland.blog.gov.uk/2024/09/19/testing-the-miyawaki-method-in-our-urban-greenspaces/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful