evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

UPPR — Bangladesh's Community-Led Urban Poverty Reduction Programme

Bangladesh · Dhaka · See the Bangladesh profile · See the Dhaka profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 72% 62/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Running from 2008 to 2015, Bangladesh's UPPR programme funded community-led settlement improvements and livelihood support across 23 towns and cities, reaching an estimated 3 million poor and extreme-poor residents through UNDP, UK aid and government co-financing.

3 million
Residents reached (2008–2015)
23 towns/cities
Towns and cities covered (2008–2015)
21 stakeholders
Institutional stakeholders interviewed (2016 study) (2016)
100 participants
Community participants interviewed (2016 study) (2016)
11 practices
Exemplary practices identified (2016)

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
UNDP Bangladesh, Government of Bangladesh (Ministry of LGRD) and UK aid
Period
2008–2015
Keywords
urban poverty, informal settlements, community development, livelihoods

Context

The Urban Partnerships for Poverty Reduction (UPPR) programme ran in Bangladesh from March 2008 to August 2015, building on an earlier pilot (the Local Partnerships for Urban Poverty Alleviation Project, 2000–2007). It was, at the time, the largest urban poverty-reduction programme in Bangladesh, jointly funded by UK aid, UNDP and the Government of Bangladesh, with beneficiary communities also contributing.

Activities

UPPR organised residents of low-income urban settlements into community groups that produced their own "community action plans," which in turn generated prioritised contracts for infrastructure improvements and livelihood activities. Communities executed these contracts directly and managed the associated funds themselves.

Results

The programme reported reaching roughly 3 million poor and extreme-poor residents, with a particular focus on women and girls, across 23 towns and cities.

Conclusions

A 2016 UNDP-commissioned study documenting the programme's practices drew on interviews with 21 institutional stakeholders and 100 community participants across all 23 towns, and identified 11 practices considered exemplary for urban poverty reduction, feeding into Bangladesh's subsequent National Urban Poverty Reduction Programme. Public reporting reviewed here documents the programme's scale, funding structure and process design well, but does not provide independently verified quantitative outcome metrics (e.g. income or health changes) at the household level, limiting the strength of the impact evidence available.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Ran March 2008 – August 2015, building on the 2000–2007 LPUPAP pilot; its practices fed into Bangladesh's subsequent National Urban Poverty Reduction Programme.
Staffing & skills
UNDP Bangladesh (programme management), Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives (LGRD), UK aid (co-funder), Community groups (co-implementers, managed funds directly)

Conditions for success

  • Community-produced action plans and direct community management of contract funds built local ownership of infrastructure and livelihood investments
  • Built on lessons and continuity from an earlier pilot (LPUPAP, 2000–2007), giving the programme an established operating model from the start

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes ESF+ — European Social Fund Plus

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful