evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Valence-Romans' CNAF “Optimal Fair Matching” Algorithm for Daycare Place Allocation

France · Valence · See the France profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 81% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

During France's 2020 lockdown, when Valence-Romans' human allocation committee could not meet, CNAF researchers ran daycare-place allocation entirely through a “student-optimal fair matching” algorithm, satisfying 400 of 1,014 applications (39%) in the first round.

1,014
Applications submitted (May 2020)
400 (39.4%)
Applications satisfied (May 2020)
Valence-Romans' CNAF “Optimal Fair Matching” Algorithm for Daycare Place Allocation

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Caisse nationale des allocations familiales (CNAF) — ISAJE research programme, with Valence Romans Agglo
Period
May 2020 (first algorithmic allocation round)
Region (NUTS)
FRK2
Keywords
early-childhood education, daycare/crèche allocation, algorithmic administration, applied research

Context

Public daycare (crèche) places are scarce in France — fewer than two places for every ten children under three nationally — and allocation traditionally relied on a municipal committee scoring applications, a process long suspected of favouring well-connected families.

Activities

CNAF researchers, through its ISAJE programme, partnered with Valence Romans Agglo to convert existing allocation criteria into a computerised 'student-optimal fair matching' algorithm — a variant of the Gale-Shapley deferred-acceptance mechanism — guaranteeing no lower-priority family could take a place from a higher-priority family who preferred it.

Results

Because the pandemic prevented the human allocation committee from meeting in person, the May 2020 round was run entirely by the algorithm for the first time in France, satisfying 400 of 1,014 applications (39.4%) submitted for that cycle; the algorithm's proposed distribution was then reviewed and formally validated by the agglomeration's allocation commission before places were confirmed.

Conclusions

Coverage of the pilot notes it addressed only one allocation round in one municipality, with no published before/after comparison against the discretionary system it replaced, and some local officials elsewhere in France voiced concern about losing decision-making discretion.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
CNAF ISAJE research programme team, Valence Romans Agglo allocation commission

Conditions for success

  • Algorithm's output still reviewed and formally validated by the human allocation commission before places were confirmed, rather than fully automated
  • Explicit anti-cronyism design goal (guaranteeing no lower-priority family can displace a higher-priority one) built into the matching-market mechanism

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful