evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Virtual Assistant for Judges — Vietnam's Supreme People's Court Nationwide AI Legal-Research Tool

Vietnam · Hà Nội · See the Vietnam profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 46% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Launched in April 2022 by Vietnam's Supreme People's Court with Viettel Group, the judges' AI virtual assistant has fielded nearly 6 million legal queries nationwide, averaging 10,000–15,000 a day, and is credited with saving about 37 billion VND ($1.45M) a year.

173,000+
Legal documents integrated
~6 million
Queries fielded since 2022
37 billion VND (~US$1.45M)
Estimated annual judicial time savings (per year)
Virtual Assistant for Judges — Vietnam's Supreme People's Court Nationwide AI Legal-Research Tool

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Supreme People's Court of Vietnam / Viettel Group (Viettel AI)
Period
2022–2025
Keywords
justice, courts, digital government, legal technology

Context

Launched 6 April 2022 by Vietnam's Supreme People's Court with Viettel Group, the Virtual Assistant for Judges is a 24/7 AI legal-research tool integrating over 173,000 legal documents and 1.4 million judgments.

Results

A nationwide training programme reached over 5,000 delegates across all 63 provinces; the assistant has fielded nearly 6 million queries since 2022 and is credited with saving an estimated 37 billion VND a year in judicial time, though no independent data on answer accuracy or effects on case outcomes has been published.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Supreme People's Court, Viettel Group (AI platform partner)

Conditions for success

  • Nationwide training programme (5,000+ delegates, 800+ court connection points)
  • 100+ judges/legal experts validated content before go-live

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful