evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Web Accessibility Accreditation for Government & School Websites

Taiwan · Taipei · See the Taiwan profile · See the Taipei profile

Top 59% 68/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Taiwan's Ministry of Digital Affairs runs a legally mandated, four-tier (A/A+/AA/AAA) accessibility accreditation scheme for all government and school websites, combining automated and manual testing, with badges renewed every three years.

Details

Promoter
Ministry of Digital Affairs (MODA)
Period
2011-present (standard revised 2017, 2021)
Keywords
digital government, web accessibility, public sector IT, education

Description

Taiwan's Persons with Disabilities Rights Protection Act was amended in February 2011 to require accessible public information, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs (formerly National Communications Commission) followed with a formal Website Accessibility Standard based on W3C WCAG 2.0, effective 15 February 2017 and revised in July 2021 (version 110.07).
Every government agency and public school website must pass a four-tier accreditation process — Level 1 (A), A+, Level 2 (AA) and Level 3 (AAA) — combining automated scanning with the government's own Freego checker tool and manual expert review. Accreditation badges are valid for three years, after which sites must be re-tested to keep displaying them.
Independent confirmation comes from the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative's own policy tracker, which lists Taiwan's scheme as a mandatory, public-sector-wide WCAG 2.1-derivative policy. Neither MODA's own site nor the W3C listing publishes an aggregate pass-rate or number of accredited sites in English, so this entry is scored conservatively on measured evidence: the mandate's legal durability and universal public-sector scope are well documented, but outcome data (how many sites actually hold a current badge, at what level) is not publicly quantified in the sources available.

Read the full analysis: https://accessibility.moda.gov.tw/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful