evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Wildlife Conservation Bond ("Rhino Bond") — Addo & Great Fish River Reserves, South Africa

South Africa · Gqeberha (Port Elizabeth) · See the South Africa profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 90% 27/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The World Bank's $150M 'Rhino Bond' (2022-2027) funds anti-poaching at two South African reserves via roughly $10M in conservation payments, with investor returns tied to a GEF success payment (up to $13.8M) contingent on independently verified black rhino population growth.

$150,000,000
Bond size (2022-2027)
94.8% of nominal aggregate amount
Bond issue price
~ZAR 152,000,000 (~$10,000,000)
Conservation Investment Payments
up to $13,800,000
Maximum Conservation Success Payment (GEF, at maturity) (due 31 March 2027)
2,400 (1995) to 5,600+ (recent)
South Africa national black rhino population (historical backdrop)

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
World Bank / Global Environment Facility, with SANParks and Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency
Period
2022-2027
Keywords
outcome-based conservation finance, wildlife bond, black rhino conservation, results-based grant, biodiversity outcome verification

Context

In March 2022, the World Bank issued a five-year, $150 million Sustainable Development Bond — the "Wildlife Conservation Bond" or "Rhino Bond" — sold at 94.8% of its nominal aggregate amount.

Objectives

Fund anti-poaching and habitat protection at Addo Elephant National Park and Great Fish River Nature Reserve through outcome-linked conservation finance, with investor returns contingent on measured black rhino population growth rather than conventional coupons.

Activities

Bond proceeds fund roughly ZAR 152 million (about $10 million) in "Conservation Investment Payments" to South African National Parks (SANParks) and the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency (ECPTA), which manage anti-poaching and habitat protection at the two reserves. Population counts are independently verified by the Zoological Society of London, with overall programme performance assessed by Conservation Alpha. At maturity (31 March 2027) a Global Environment Facility results-based grant will pay investors a "Conservation Success Payment" of up to $13.8 million, scaled to the actual black rhino population growth rate achieved.

Conclusions

As of this evaluation, the bond has not yet matured, so no population-growth outcome or investor payment has been realised or verified — all figures here describe the bond's structuring, not a delivered result. It is a species-outcome bond rather than a tradeable biodiversity credit. The two reserves already had comparatively strong anti-poaching track records before the bond (Great Fish River Reserve had not lost a rhino to poaching beforehand), raising a selection-bias question about how much of any future success is attributable to the instrument itself.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
South African National Parks (SANParks), Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency (ECPTA), Zoological Society of London (independent population verification), Conservation Alpha (overall programme performance assessment)

Conditions for success

  • Independent, third-party verification of rhino population counts (Zoological Society of London)
  • Transparent, audited financial structuring via World Bank issuance and a GEF results-based grant
  • Reserves with existing anti-poaching infrastructure and track record

Common failure modes

  • Selection bias: the two reserves already had comparatively strong anti-poaching track records before the bond, complicating attribution of any future population growth to the instrument itself
  • Outcome and investor payment remain unverified until bond maturity in March 2027

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful