evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Wildlife Conservation Bond ("Rhino Bond") — Addo & Great Fish River Reserves, South Africa

South Africa · Gqeberha (Port Elizabeth) · See the South Africa profile

The World Bank's $150M 'Rhino Bond' (2022-2027) funds anti-poaching at two South African reserves via roughly $10M in conservation payments, with investor returns tied to a GEF success payment (up to $13.8M) contingent on independently verified black rhino population growth.

Details

Promoter
World Bank / Global Environment Facility, with SANParks and Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency
Period
2022-2027
Keywords
outcome-based conservation finance, wildlife bond, black rhino conservation, results-based grant, biodiversity outcome verification

Description

In March 2022, the World Bank issued a five-year, $150 million Sustainable Development Bond — the "Wildlife Conservation Bond" or "Rhino Bond" — sold at 94.8% of its nominal aggregate amount. Rather than paying conventional coupons, bond proceeds fund roughly ZAR 152 million (about $10 million) in "Conservation Investment Payments" to South African National Parks (SANParks) and the Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency (ECPTA), which manage anti-poaching and habitat protection at Addo Elephant National Park and Great Fish River Nature Reserve.

Investor returns are entirely contingent on a measured conservation outcome: at the bond's maturity on 31 March 2027, a Global Environment Facility results-based grant will pay investors a "Conservation Success Payment" of up to $13.8 million, scaled to the actual black rhino population growth rate achieved at the two reserves. Population counts are independently verified by the Zoological Society of London, with overall programme performance assessed by Conservation Alpha. South Africa's national black rhino population has grown from about 2,400 in 1995 to more than 5,600 in recent counts, providing the historical backdrop against which the bond's targets are set.

Caveats: as of this evaluation, the bond has not yet matured, so no population-growth outcome or investor payment has been realised or verified — all figures here describe the bond's structuring, not a delivered result. It is also a species-outcome bond rather than a tradeable biodiversity credit in the strict market sense. Finally, the two reserves selected already had comparatively strong anti-poaching track records before the bond (Great Fish River Reserve had not lost a rhino to poaching beforehand), raising a selection-bias question about how much of any future success is attributable to the instrument itself.

Read the full analysis: https://www.business-standard.com/article/international/first-wildlife-bond-issued-by-world-bank-to-save-africa-s-black-rhino-122032400439_1.html

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 53

England Biodiversity Net Gain

United Kingdom

Since February 2024, most development in England must deliver a measurable 10% biodiversity net gain in standardised biodiversity units — …