evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

World Bank Malawi Poverty Map — Testing Whether Satellite AI Can Target Social Cash Transfers

Malawi · Lilongwe · See the Malawi profile · See the Lilongwe profile

Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 83% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A World Bank study tested whether AI-processed satellite imagery can substitute for costly household surveys in targeting Malawi's social safety net, finding the machine-learning poverty maps track broad regional patterns well but are less reliable for pinpointing which specific

Details

Promoter
World Bank, with Malawi's National Statistical Office
Period
2022-2024
Keywords
social protection, poverty mapping, remote sensing, machine learning, cash transfers

Context

Malawi's anti-poverty programmes need up-to-date, small-area estimates of where poor households live, but household surveys detailed enough for fine-grained targeting are expensive and quickly go out of date.

Objectives

World Bank researchers (Roy van der Weide, Brian Blankespoor, Chris Elbers and Peter Lanjouw) tested whether satellite imagery processed by machine-learning models could fill that gap.

Activities

Researchers combined Malawi's 2010/11 Integrated Household Survey with 2008 population census data to build a conventional small-area poverty estimate, then built a second poverty map using machine-learning predictions derived from satellite-based remote-sensing indicators, comparing how well each map identified Malawi's poorest areas.

Results

The two approaches agreed on the broad geography of poverty across regions and districts but diverged substantially for many specific small areas. The remote-sensing/machine-learning map performed well for ranking larger areas (e.g. allocating a national safety-net budget across districts) but was not reliable enough on its own to decide which specific villages or households should receive benefits.

Conclusions

The authors explicitly caution against relying on remote-sensing poverty maps as a stand-alone replacement for household-survey data when fine-grained targeting decisions are at stake, recommending they complement rather than substitute for traditional survey-based targeting — a finding at odds with more optimistic results reported for similar methods in Nigeria.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Not disclosed; a research project building on existing survey/census data and satellite imagery rather than new field data collection.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Built on 2008 census and 2010/11 survey data; published as a working paper in 2022 and in a peer-reviewed journal in 2024.
Staffing & skills
World Bank research team (van der Weide, Blankespoor, Elbers, Lanjouw), Malawi's National Statistical Office (survey/census data partner)

Conditions for success

  • Access to a recent, high-quality household survey (2010/11 Integrated Household Survey) and census (2008) as ground truth
  • Transparent publication of methodology and limitations, including where the approach underperforms
  • Framing the tool as a complement to, not replacement for, survey-based targeting

Common failure modes

  • Machine-learning/satellite map was not reliable enough for household- or village-level targeting decisions, only for larger-area budget allocation
  • Results diverged from more optimistic findings for comparable methods in Nigeria, meaning performance is not assumed to transfer across countries
  • No Malawian government safety-net programme had adopted the method at time of reporting

Where it fits

Governance type
research / World Bank technical assistance
Scale
national (Malawi)
Income level
low-income

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful