evidoria

What works in Malawi

All catalogues

16
evaluated practices
60/100
average quality score
23%
strong evidence, of 13 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Malawi

Malawi has implemented several large-scale digital and economic development programmes with measurable outcomes. The Malawi Digital Foundations Project (DIGMAP) brought nearly 7 million Malawians online for the first time and trained over 19,000 youth at Tech Hubs through World Bank funding of US$72.4M (2017–2024), while The Turing Trust increased IT-lab access in the Northern Region from 5% to 81% of secondary schools since 2016. CARE's Village Savings and Loan Associations, tested via RCT on 15,221 households, increased women's savings by 34% and monthly business profits by 24% at low cost (USD 7.01 per household). Additionally, Tiwerenge 365 has reached 3,500 children including 90+ with disabilities through solar-powered digital reading clubs, though this evidence remains largely self-reported.

Drawn from: Tiwerenge 365 (T365) — Solar-Powered Accessible Digital Books for Children with Disabilities in Malawi · The Turing Trust — Refurbished Computers & Offline E-Libraries for Malawi's Secondary Schools · Malawi Digital Foundations Project (DIGMAP) – National Digital Infrastructure, Skills and Connectivity Programme · CARE Village Savings and Loan Associations (VSLAs) — Women's Financial Inclusion and Economic Empowerment in Rural Malawi · mHub & the UNDP Growth Accelerator Challenge — Financing Malawi's Youth and Women-Led Enterprises · BEFIT — Building Education Foundations through Innovation & Technology: AI-adaptive foundational literacy and numeracy for Malawi's primary schools · Malawi Innovation Challenge Fund — Matching Grants Turning Inclusive-Business Ideas into Jobs · Financial Inclusion and Entrepreneurship Scaling (FInES) Project

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Inclusiveness / equity +47 pts 89 here · 42 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +28 pts 78 here · 50 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evidence of learning impact +17 pts 44 here · 28 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +8 pts 56 here · 48 average

Weaknesses

Scalability & sustainability -8 pts 56 here · 64 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -9 pts 22 here · 31 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Governance, certification & transferability -9 pts 56 here · 64 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -26 pts 11 here · 37 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -40 pts 11 here · 51 average

Curator validation -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Inclusiveness / equity
89 · 42
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
78 · 50
Documented learning
100 · 74
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 76
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evidence of learning impact
44 · 28
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transparency, ethics & data protection
56 · 48
Sustainability (ongoing)
86 · 78
Transferability / replicability
62 · 59
Transparency, fairness & accountability
56 · 54
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Innovation level
56 · 63
Scalability & sustainability
56 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
22 · 31
Evidence of impact / measured public value
50 · 59
Governance, certification & transferability
56 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
11 · 37
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
11 · 51
Curator validation
0 · 74

Coloured bar: Malawi. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Tiwerenge 365 (T365) — Solar-Powered Accessible Digital Books for Children with Disabilities in Malawi · 96

The Turing Trust — Refurbished Computers & Offline E-Libraries for Malawi's Secondary Schools · 92

Malawi Digital Foundations Project (DIGMAP) – National Digital Infrastructure, Skills and Connectivity Programme · 92

CARE Village Savings and Loan Associations (VSLAs) — Women's Financial Inclusion and Economic Empowerment in Rural Malawi · 89

mHub & the UNDP Growth Accelerator Challenge — Financing Malawi's Youth and Women-Led Enterprises · 76

BEFIT — Building Education Foundations through Innovation & Technology: AI-adaptive foundational literacy and numeracy for Malawi's primary schools · 73

Malawi Innovation Challenge Fund — Matching Grants Turning Inclusive-Business Ideas into Jobs · 71

Financial Inclusion and Entrepreneurship Scaling (FInES) Project · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Malawi concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more