evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

ZRA AI Unit — Zambia Revenue Authority's Machine-Learning Customs Risk Model

Zambia · Lusaka · See the Zambia profile

Zambia Revenue Authority's AI Unit is piloting a Random Forest ML model, adapted from a Paraguay customs deployment, to flag high-risk import declarations for inspection, targeting an estimated 47–56% customs tax gap; rigorous pilot results are still pending.

Details

Promoter
Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA), AI Unit, with UC Berkeley's Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA)
Period
AI Unit since 2023; ML customs pilot November 2025–ongoing
Keywords
customs risk management, tax administration, machine learning, revenue collection, public-private research partnership

Description

Since around 2023, the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) has operated an in-house "AI Unit" tasked with modernising tax and customs administration through machine learning. In partnership with the University of California, Berkeley's Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA), the unit adapted a Random Forest model — previously piloted on Paraguayan customs data — to flag high-risk import declarations for physical inspection, aiming to address an estimated 47–56% customs tax gap across roughly half a million commercial shipments processed annually.

The customs risk-scoring pilot began around November 2025 and, according to CEGA, is being evaluated through a randomised design; quantitative results on detection accuracy or revenue recovered specifically attributable to the model had not yet been published as of the pilot's start. The AI Unit also runs adjacent tools, including a taxpayer chatbot, an HS-code lookup assistant, and automated compliance "nudges."

ZRA and Zambia's Ministry of Technology and Science have publicly stated that AI-driven modernisation across the revenue authority's operations contributed to a 60% increase in revenue collection over two years. That figure describes the broader AI programme rather than being isolated to the customs Random Forest model, and it has not been independently audited, so it should be read as an institutional claim rather than a verified causal result of this specific practice.

Read the full analysis: https://www.mots.gov.zm/?p=3787

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful