Top 26%
en este catálogo (246 prácticas puntuadas)
Las puntuaciones se concentran en valores altos, por lo que la posición dentro del catálogo suele ser más reveladora que el número por sí solo.
Evidence of impact / measured public value1/3
Beyond a peer-reviewed methodology paper, quantitative outcome figures (time saved, volumes processed, precision/recall) are asserted in Senate communications without independently verifiable hard numbers, so impact evidence remains largely self-reported.
Transparency, fairness & accountability3/3
The clustering methodology was published in a peer-reviewed paper and the full source code is released as open source on GitHub with a documented API.
Transferability / demonstrated replication3/3
The open-source release, REST API and CLI, plus the peer-reviewed publication, make the approach directly reusable by other parliaments, and it was independently profiled by the IPU as a case study for that purpose.
Scalability beyond pilot1/3
The tool is deployed within a single legislative chamber (the Senate) for its own amendment workload since around 2019, with no evidence yet of scaling to other chambers or institutions.
Governance, capability & sustainability2/3
Human-in-the-loop design is explicit and documented — the Speaker retains final authority over the voting order — though there is no independent audit of the tool's clustering accuracy or its influence on outcomes.
Evidoria. Similis — La herramienta de IA del Senado italiano para agrupar enmiendas legislativas casi idénticas. ID persistente: 8388e93c-63e3-4f6f-824e-f996d0ac71ab.