Top 26%
dans ce catalogue (246 pratiques notées)
Les scores se concentrent dans le haut de l’échelle ; la position au sein du catalogue est donc souvent plus parlante que le chiffre seul.
Evidence of impact / measured public value1/3
Beyond a peer-reviewed methodology paper, quantitative outcome figures (time saved, volumes processed, precision/recall) are asserted in Senate communications without independently verifiable hard numbers, so impact evidence remains largely self-reported.
Transparency, fairness & accountability3/3
The clustering methodology was published in a peer-reviewed paper and the full source code is released as open source on GitHub with a documented API.
Transferability / demonstrated replication3/3
The open-source release, REST API and CLI, plus the peer-reviewed publication, make the approach directly reusable by other parliaments, and it was independently profiled by the IPU as a case study for that purpose.
Scalability beyond pilot1/3
The tool is deployed within a single legislative chamber (the Senate) for its own amendment workload since around 2019, with no evidence yet of scaling to other chambers or institutions.
Governance, capability & sustainability2/3
Human-in-the-loop design is explicit and documented — the Speaker retains final authority over the voting order — though there is no independent audit of the tool's clustering accuracy or its influence on outcomes.
Evidoria. Similis — L'outil d'IA du Sénat italien pour regrouper les amendements législatifs quasi identiques. ID persistant: 8388e93c-63e3-4f6f-824e-f996d0ac71ab.