What works in Andorra la Vella
All catalogues · Andorra profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +26 pts 33 here · 7 average
Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average
Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average
Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average
Sustainability +10 pts 89 here · 78 average
Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Weaknesses
Scalability & sustainability -8 pts 56 here · 64 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average
Governance, capability & sustainability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average
Innovation -16 pts 47 here · 63 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -17 pts 33 here · 50 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average
Transferability / replicability -26 pts 33 here · 60 average
Evidence of learning impact -28 pts 0 here · 28 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average
Inclusiveness / equity -42 pts 0 here · 42 average
Evidence of impact / measured results -42 pts 17 here · 59 average
Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average
Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average
Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Andorra la Vella. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Andorra's Law 6/2022 on Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination Between Women and Men · 63
Andorra Business's EUR 2M Grant Call - Quadrupled Overnight, Still Unproven · 38
LIFE Pyrenees4Clima — Andorra as a Cross-Border Mountain Climate-Resilience Pilot Territory · 33
Govern d'Andorra's Planned Microsoft Copilot Rollout — Generative AI for Every Civil Servant by 2027 · 27
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more