evidoria

What works in Auckland

All catalogues · New Zealand profile

5
evaluated practices
55/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 5 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Auckland

Auckland features several innovation and digital-equity initiatives. Skinny Jump delivers heavily subsidised 4G broadband (NZD $5 per 35 GB) to low-income households, reaching 31,776 active connections by July 2024 through a 300+ community-partner network. Auckland UniServices manages the University of Auckland's research commercialisation, with 45 active spin-outs worth a combined NZ$2.2 billion and 540+ patent families licensed. The Edmund Hillary Fellowship was launched in Auckland in 2016 and ran a four-year Global Impact Visa pilot, with fellows reporting NZ$94 million invested into local start-ups and NZ$572.2 million raised for New Zealand businesses, though these figures are self-reported without independent audit. Tūī, an AI avatar pilot by Auckland Transport, provides real-time New Zealand Sign Language translations of transit alerts for an estimated 24,500 NZSL users nationally, though the three-month pilot has produced no outcome data yet.

Drawn from: Skinny Jump – Subsidised Mobile Broadband for Low-Income Households · Auckland UniServices — University of Auckland's Research Commercialisation Company · Edmund Hillary Fellowship & the Global Impact Visa · Tūī — Auckland Transport's AI New Zealand Sign Language Avatar for Transit Alerts · Watercare's Hūnua and Waitākere Native Forest Catchment Protection (Auckland, New Zealand)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Scalability -10 pts 56 here · 66 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -13 pts 67 here · 80 average

Transferability / demonstrated replication -15 pts 44 here · 59 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -27 pts 33 here · 60 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -35 pts 0 here · 35 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Innovation level
69 · 64
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 66
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 41
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Scalability
56 · 66
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 78
Sustainability (ongoing)
67 · 80
Transferability / demonstrated replication
44 · 59
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Evidence of impact / measured results
33 · 60
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 35

Coloured bar: Auckland. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Skinny Jump – Subsidised Mobile Broadband for Low-Income Households · 88

Auckland UniServices — University of Auckland's Research Commercialisation Company · 67

Edmund Hillary Fellowship & the Global Impact Visa · 48

Tūī — Auckland Transport's AI New Zealand Sign Language Avatar for Transit Alerts · 40

Watercare's Hūnua and Waitākere Native Forest Catchment Protection (Auckland, New Zealand) · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more