evidoria

What works in Belgrade

All catalogues · Serbia profile

9
evaluated practices
56/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 8 assessed
3
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Belgrade

Belgrade has established itself as a hub for innovation and technology through the Science Technology Park Belgrade, which has supported over 240 tech companies employing 2,800+ people and exporting to 60+ countries since 2015, with its model subsequently replicated in other Serbian cities. The city is also advancing urban sustainability through BELLAB, the Western Balkans' first Urban Living Lab, which brings together 60 participants from 35 institutions to co-design climate-resilient urban projects. Additionally, Belgrade's municipal government has implemented a 40% electoral gender quota as part of national electoral reform, contributing to women's representation in the National Assembly reaching 38% by July 2025, though still below the legal target.

Drawn from: Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · Science Technology Park Belgrade — Quadruple-Helix Tech Growth Hub · BELLAB — Belgrade's First Urban Living Lab for Climate-Resilient Co-Creation · Poreska Uprava Big Data CRM — Serbia's AI Compliance Risk Management Platform · Serbia's eUprava AI Assistant — Over 357,000 Conversations and a Fifth Assistant, 'Radoslav', for Social Benefits · Serbia's compulsory AI curriculum for grades 7–8, backed by Petlja Foundation/UNDP teacher training · Coding - New Kind of Literacy for Students with Hearing Impairments · Serbia's Forest Use Compensation & Budgetary Forest Fund

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +25 pts 33 here · 9 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Inclusiveness / equity +9 pts 50 here · 41 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of impact / measured public value -13 pts 47 here · 60 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -18 pts 33 here · 51 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -31 pts 22 here · 54 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -53 pts 0 here · 53 average

Demonstrated reach -75 pts 0 here · 75 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 52
Documented learning
100 · 73
Curator validation
100 · 75
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
33 · 9
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 78
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Inclusiveness / equity
50 · 41
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Sustainability (ongoing)
83 · 80
Scalability beyond pilot
67 · 66
Innovation level
64 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 35
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 39
Evidence of impact / measured public value
47 · 60
Governance, capability & sustainability
50 · 66
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 51
Transparency, fairness & accountability
22 · 54
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
0 · 53
Demonstrated reach
0 · 75

Coloured bar: Belgrade. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · 100

Science Technology Park Belgrade — Quadruple-Helix Tech Growth Hub · 71

BELLAB — Belgrade's First Urban Living Lab for Climate-Resilient Co-Creation · 62

Poreska Uprava Big Data CRM — Serbia's AI Compliance Risk Management Platform · 60

Serbia's eUprava AI Assistant — Over 357,000 Conversations and a Fifth Assistant, 'Radoslav', for Social Benefits · 53

Serbia's compulsory AI curriculum for grades 7–8, backed by Petlja Foundation/UNDP teacher training · 53

Coding - New Kind of Literacy for Students with Hearing Impairments · 52

Serbia's Forest Use Compensation & Budgetary Forest Fund · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

VIGINUM's D3lta — France's Open-Source AI Tool for Detecting Coordinated Disinformation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more