evidoria

What works in Serbia

All catalogues

23
evaluated practices
51/100
average quality score
5%
strong evidence, of 20 assessed
3
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Serbia

Serbia has made measurable progress on women's political representation through electoral reform, with women's seats in the National Assembly rising to 38% (95 of 250) by July 2025 following a 2020 law raising the gender quota to 40%, though this still falls short of the legal target. The country has developed innovation infrastructure supporting tech entrepreneurship, with the Science Technology Park Belgrade backing over 240 tech companies employing 2,800+ people and exporting to 60+ countries since 2015. Serbia has also deployed accessibility technology for marginalized groups, including an AI sign-language translator at Belgrade Central Railway Station and digital literacy training for over 600 older adults across six municipalities, though these latter initiatives remain self-reported without independent verification.

Drawn from: Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · TransportSign — SignAvatar's AI Speech-to-Sign-Language Translator at Belgrade Central Railway Station · Science Technology Park Belgrade — Quadruple-Helix Tech Growth Hub · Digital Literacy Course for Older Persons – PRO Programme (Serbia) · Innovation Vouchers — Serbia's Co-Financed SME–Research Institution Matchmaking Scheme · BELLAB — Belgrade's First Urban Living Lab for Climate-Resilient Co-Creation · Poreska Uprava Big Data CRM — Serbia's AI Compliance Risk Management Platform · Serbia's Mini, Matching and Collaborative Grants — World Bank-Evaluated SME Co-Financing via RAS

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +18 pts 92 here · 74 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +12 pts 50 here · 38 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Scalability beyond pilot -9 pts 53 here · 62 average

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Evaluated outcomes -11 pts 67 here · 78 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -12 pts 52 here · 64 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Equity & inclusion -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Achievement / evidence -20 pts 67 here · 87 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -26 pts 22 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence -29 pts 20 here · 49 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -32 pts 22 here · 54 average

Effectiveness -33 pts 33 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -36 pts 33 here · 70 average

Documented learning -54 pts 20 here · 74 average

Score profile vs peers

Curator validation
100 · 73
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
92 · 74
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 38
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
56 · 48
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 27
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
11 · 6
Demonstrated reach
80 · 76
Innovation level
65 · 62
Evidence of impact / measured public value
60 · 57
Efficiency
33 · 32
Transferability / demonstrated replication
62 · 60
Sustainability (ongoing)
78 · 78
Inclusiveness / equity
42 · 43
Scalability beyond pilot
53 · 62
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Evaluated outcomes
67 · 78
Governance, capability & sustainability
52 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Achievement / evidence
67 · 87
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
22 · 48
Evaluation evidence
20 · 49
Transparency, fairness & accountability
22 · 54
Effectiveness
33 · 66
Impact on gender equality
33 · 70
Documented learning
20 · 74

Coloured bar: Serbia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · 100

TransportSign — SignAvatar's AI Speech-to-Sign-Language Translator at Belgrade Central Railway Station · 76

Science Technology Park Belgrade — Quadruple-Helix Tech Growth Hub · 71

Digital Literacy Course for Older Persons – PRO Programme (Serbia) · 68

Innovation Vouchers — Serbia's Co-Financed SME–Research Institution Matchmaking Scheme · 67

BELLAB — Belgrade's First Urban Living Lab for Climate-Resilient Co-Creation · 62

Poreska Uprava Big Data CRM — Serbia's AI Compliance Risk Management Platform · 60

Serbia's Mini, Matching and Collaborative Grants — World Bank-Evaluated SME Co-Financing via RAS · 57

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Serbia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more