evidoria

What works in Berlin

All catalogues · Germany profile

37
evaluated practices
66/100
average quality score
6%
strong evidence, of 35 assessed
8
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Berlin

Quartiersmanagement has invested €532 million across 42 designated disadvantaged districts since 1999, financing roughly 8,200 projects through resident-majority neighbourhood councils, though a federal evaluation found mixed problem-fit in area strategies. Wheelmap, created by Berlin NGO Sozialhelden, has crowdsourced wheelchair-accessibility ratings for over 2 million places globally since 2010, with significantly higher data density in Germany than elsewhere. The Berlin Equal Opportunities Program has run since 2001 to promote women's advancement in research and teaching across Berlin's universities and medical institution, though the evidence provided does not quantify its outcomes.

Drawn from: Stark im Beruf — Federal Labour-Market Integration Programme for Mothers with a Migration Background · Wheelmap — Crowdsourced Wheelchair-Accessibility Mapping · Digitaler Engel · Quartiersmanagement — Berlin's Resident-Led Neighbourhood Management Programme · The Berlin Program to Promote Equal Opportunities for Women in Research and Teaching (Berlin Equal Opportunities Program – BCP) · Mütterrente — Germany's Pension-Point Credit for Child-Raising Time · Germany's Gender Quota Law (FüPoG) — Mandatory 30% Female Representation on Supervisory Boards · BFIT-Bund's Second EU Monitoring Report — Tracking Digital Accessibility Across German Public Bodies

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Inclusiveness / equity +32 pts 75 here · 43 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +14 pts 88 here · 74 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +13 pts 50 here · 37 average

Documented learning +10 pts 85 here · 74 average

Transferability / replicability +10 pts 70 here · 60 average

Curator validation +9 pts 82 here · 73 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +9 pts 67 here · 57 average

Equity & inclusion +8 pts 58 here · 50 average

Weaknesses

Governance, capability & sustainability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Efficiency -18 pts 14 here · 33 average

Evaluation evidence -26 pts 23 here · 49 average

Score profile vs peers

Inclusiveness / equity
75 · 43
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
88 · 74
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 37
Documented learning
85 · 74
Transferability / replicability
70 · 60
Curator validation
82 · 73
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 57
Equity & inclusion
58 · 50
Scalability
67 · 62
Innovation level
66 · 62
Effectiveness
71 · 68
Sustainability
80 · 78
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
92 · 89
Impact on gender equality
71 · 71
Achievement / evidence
88 · 88
Evidence of learning impact
25 · 26
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Demonstrated reach
69 · 76
Governance, capability & sustainability
50 · 64
Efficiency
14 · 33
Evaluation evidence
23 · 49

Coloured bar: Berlin. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Stark im Beruf — Federal Labour-Market Integration Programme for Mothers with a Migration Background · 96

Wheelmap — Crowdsourced Wheelchair-Accessibility Mapping · 92

Digitaler Engel · 92

Quartiersmanagement — Berlin's Resident-Led Neighbourhood Management Programme · 91

The Berlin Program to Promote Equal Opportunities for Women in Research and Teaching (Berlin Equal Opportunities Program – BCP) · 91

Mütterrente — Germany's Pension-Point Credit for Child-Raising Time · 89

Germany's Gender Quota Law (FüPoG) — Mandatory 30% Female Representation on Supervisory Boards · 89

BFIT-Bund's Second EU Monitoring Report — Tracking Digital Accessibility Across German Public Bodies · 88

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more