evidoria

What works in Germany

All catalogues

100
evaluated practices
59/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 89 assessed
1
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Germany

Germany hosts several evidence-backed integration and inclusion programmes. Stark im Beruf supported over 18,000 mothers with migration backgrounds into employment or training, with nearly one third moving into insured work by 2022. SAP Autism at Work has hired 215+ autistic employees across 16 countries with ~90% retention, while Integreat provides multilingual local information to refugees and migrants across 100+ German municipalities. Wheelmap, created by a Berlin NGO, has crowdsourced accessibility ratings for over 2 million places globally, though data density is highest in Germany.

Drawn from: Stark im Beruf — Federal Labour-Market Integration Programme for Mothers with a Migration Background · SAP Autism at Work — Neurodiversity Hiring for Digital-Sector Careers · Integreat – Digital Integration Platform for Newcomers · Action Programme Municipality – Women into Politics! · Wheelmap — Crowdsourced Wheelchair-Accessibility Mapping · AfB social & green IT: Disability-Inclusive IT Refurbishment · Digitaler Engel · Quartiersmanagement — Berlin's Resident-Led Neighbourhood Management Programme

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Inclusiveness / equity +31 pts 73 here · 42 average

Efficiency +22 pts 67 here · 44 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +18 pts 94 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Effectiveness +10 pts 88 here · 77 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +10 pts 60 here · 50 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Impact on gender equality +9 pts 89 here · 80 average

Innovation level +8 pts 71 here · 63 average

Weaknesses

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -10 pts 40 here · 50 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -11 pts 27 here · 37 average

Evaluation evidence -18 pts 26 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Inclusiveness / equity
73 · 42
Efficiency
67 · 44
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
94 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Effectiveness
88 · 77
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
60 · 50
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Impact on gender equality
89 · 80
Innovation level
71 · 63
Transparency, fairness & accountability
62 · 54
Transferability / replicability
67 · 59
Governance, capability & sustainability
70 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
53 · 48
Evidence of impact / measured results
64 · 59
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
96 · 91
Documented learning
78 · 74
Demonstrated reach
78 · 76
Evidence of learning impact
30 · 28
Scalability
66 · 64
Sustainability
76 · 78
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
27 · 31
Equity & inclusion
47 · 52
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Curator validation
67 · 74
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
40 · 50
Teacher capability & pedagogy
27 · 37
Evaluation evidence
26 · 44

Coloured bar: Germany. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Stark im Beruf — Federal Labour-Market Integration Programme for Mothers with a Migration Background · 96

SAP Autism at Work — Neurodiversity Hiring for Digital-Sector Careers · 96

Integreat – Digital Integration Platform for Newcomers · 96

Action Programme Municipality – Women into Politics! · 93

Wheelmap — Crowdsourced Wheelchair-Accessibility Mapping · 92

AfB social & green IT: Disability-Inclusive IT Refurbishment · 92

Digitaler Engel · 92

Quartiersmanagement — Berlin's Resident-Led Neighbourhood Management Programme · 91

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Germany concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more