evidoria

What works in Bharatpur

All catalogues · Nepal profile

4
evaluated practices
54/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 2 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +72 pts 100 here · 28 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Governance, certification & transferability +20 pts 83 here · 64 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Transferability / replicability -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Effectiveness -18 pts 50 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality -21 pts 50 here · 71 average

Sustainability -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -32 pts 17 here · 48 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Achievement / evidence -38 pts 50 here · 88 average

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
100 · 28
Curator validation
100 · 73
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Governance, certification & transferability
83 · 64
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Transferability / replicability
50 · 60
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Effectiveness
50 · 68
Impact on gender equality
50 · 71
Sustainability
50 · 78
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
17 · 48
Efficiency
0 · 33
Achievement / evidence
50 · 88

Coloured bar: Bharatpur. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Change Starts at Home — Couples' Curriculum and Community Diffusion Against Intimate Partner Violence, Nepal · 85

Nepal's First REDD+ Results-Based Payment — $9.4M for Terai Arc Landscape Emission Reductions · 53

Chitwan-Annapurna Landscape REDD+ Pilot — Community Forest Carbon Trust Funds (Nepal) · 40

Change Starts at Home — Radio & Community Listening Groups Against Intimate Partner Violence, Nepal · 37

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more