evidoria

What works in Brisbane

All catalogues · Australia profile

5
evaluated practices
72/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 5 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +40 pts 100 here · 60 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +32 pts 67 here · 35 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +25 pts 33 here · 9 average

Scalability +23 pts 89 here · 66 average

Sustainability / continuity +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +14 pts 67 here · 53 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +10 pts 89 here · 78 average

Weaknesses

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -18 pts 33 here · 51 average

Inclusiveness / equity -41 pts 0 here · 41 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Evidence of impact / measured results
100 · 60
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 35
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
33 · 9
Scalability
89 · 66
Sustainability / continuity
100 · 80
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 53
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
89 · 78
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 59
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 66
Innovation
57 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 51
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 41

Coloured bar: Brisbane. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

NVDA (NonVisual Desktop Access): Free Open-Source Screen Reader for Blind and Low-Vision Computer Users · 92

Uniseed — Australia's National University Venture Fund · 81

UniQuest — University of Queensland's Commercialisation Company · 71

UniQuest — Technology Transfer Company of The University of Queensland · 62

Queensland Land Restoration Fund (Australia) · 53

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more