evidoria

What works in Christchurch

All catalogues · New Zealand profile

3
evaluated practices
57/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 2 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Christchurch

The CONTEXT block contains evidence from three distinct practices in Christchurch:

Stopping Violence Services documents a nationwide network with its oldest provider operating in Christchurch since 1983, though this practice does not quantify Christchurch-specific outcomes. Gap Filler shows that following the 2010–11 earthquakes, community organisations activated over 700 transitional public projects on vacant sites, fostering social and ecological connection, though the evidence is largely qualitative rather than impact-evaluated. Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor documents a Crown-led managed retreat converting approximately 600 hectares from an 8,000-property liquefaction-damaged red zone into an 11 km green spine, including 80 hectares of constructed wetlands treating stormwater for roughly 25,000 properties—though full ecological and carbon outcomes remain unmeasured and the programme is still unfolding beyond 2023.

Drawn from: Stopping Violence Services — New Zealand's Court-Linked Network of Non-Violence Programmes for Men · Gap Filler — Community-Led Temporary Reuse of Earthquake-Vacant Sites in Christchurch · Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor — Post-Earthquake Managed Retreat into a Floodplain Green Spine

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Governance, certification & transferability +36 pts 100 here · 64 average

Impact on gender equality +29 pts 100 here · 71 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +9 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Transferability / replicability -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Effectiveness -68 pts 0 here · 68 average

Achievement / evidence -88 pts 0 here · 88 average

Score profile vs peers

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 48
Governance, certification & transferability
100 · 64
Impact on gender equality
100 · 71
Curator validation
100 · 73
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 57
Sustainability
83 · 78
Innovation
67 · 62
Scalability
67 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Transferability / replicability
50 · 60
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 28
Efficiency
0 · 33
Effectiveness
0 · 68
Achievement / evidence
0 · 88

Coloured bar: Christchurch. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Stopping Violence Services — New Zealand's Court-Linked Network of Non-Violence Programmes for Men · 63

Gap Filler — Community-Led Temporary Reuse of Earthquake-Vacant Sites in Christchurch · 62

Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor — Post-Earthquake Managed Retreat into a Floodplain Green Spine · 47

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more