What works in Cyberjaya
All catalogues · Malaysia profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Cyberjaya
Cyberjaya 2.0 is Malaysia's relaunched tech-city development, originally founded in 1997, now operating 47 smart-city pilot projects and hosting over 40,000 knowledge workers across its corridor. The master developer Cyberview projects RM250 billion in GDP contribution and 87,000 jobs by 2045, though these are 2045 masterplan targets rather than achieved results. Verified traction includes over RM30 billion in newly announced data-centre investment (2024–2025) and the CLLA accelerator supporting resident companies that have raised over RM255 million and generated RM792 million in cumulative revenue since 2013, creating 1,450+ jobs.
Drawn from: NADI – National Information Dissemination Centre · Malaysia's DE Rantau Nomad Pass · Cyberjaya 2.0 — Malaysia's Master-Planned Tech City Reboot · AI untuk Rakyat — Malaysia's National AI Literacy Digital-Badge Programme · MyGOV's AI Chatbot — A Malaysian Government Rollback After Nonsense Answers
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average
Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average
Weaknesses
Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average
Transferability / demonstrated replication -27 pts 33 here · 60 average
Governance, capability & sustainability -30 pts 33 here · 64 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability -54 pts 0 here · 54 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Cyberjaya. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
NADI – National Information Dissemination Centre · 88
Malaysia's DE Rantau Nomad Pass · 71
Cyberjaya 2.0 — Malaysia's Master-Planned Tech City Reboot · 57
AI untuk Rakyat — Malaysia's National AI Literacy Digital-Badge Programme · 47
MyGOV's AI Chatbot — A Malaysian Government Rollback After Nonsense Answers · 7
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more