evidoria

What works in Dodoma

All catalogues · Tanzania profile

4
evaluated practices
57/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 3 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Governance, capability & sustainability +36 pts 100 here · 64 average

Scalability & sustainability +21 pts 83 here · 62 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Transferability / replicability +18 pts 78 here · 60 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +9 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Effectiveness -18 pts 50 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality -21 pts 50 here · 71 average

Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Sustainability -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Evaluated outcomes -29 pts 50 here · 79 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Achievement / evidence -38 pts 50 here · 88 average

Score profile vs peers

Governance, capability & sustainability
100 · 64
Scalability & sustainability
83 · 62
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Transferability / replicability
78 · 60
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 57
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Effectiveness
50 · 68
Impact on gender equality
50 · 71
Curator validation
50 · 73
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Sustainability
50 · 78
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 79
Efficiency
0 · 33
Achievement / evidence
50 · 88

Coloured bar: Dodoma. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

NeST: Tanzania's AI-Enabled National e-Procurement System Cuts Processing Time by Two-Thirds · 80

Tanzania Women's Constitutional Special Seats — 37.4% Women in National Assembly (1992–present) · 74

Tanzania's National Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Education · 40

Tanzania's Gender-Responsive Public Financial Management Reform — An Honest Early-Stage Assessment · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more