What works in Florence
All catalogues · Italy profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Florence
Florence has one documented evidence-based intervention: CAM, Italy's first perpetrator centre for men who use partner violence, which opened in 2009. An EU-funded evaluation of 30 men and 22 partners found statistically significant decreases in violent behaviours, police calls, and partner-reported fear, anxiety and depression by 6-month follow-up. However, this was a single-site evaluation with no comparison group, so it demonstrates within-programme change rather than a controlled causal effect.
Drawn from: CAM — Florence's Voluntary and Court-Referred Programme for Men Who Use Violence · MEET - Media Education for Equity and Tolerance · AI4T Italy — INDIRE's Tutor-Led Online Pathway Trains 275 Teachers in a Randomised Trial (Erasmus+)
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evidence of learning impact +40 pts 67 here · 26 average
Effectiveness +34 pts 100 here · 66 average
Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy +29 pts 67 here · 38 average
Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average
Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average
Innovation level +18 pts 80 here · 62 average
Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average
Weaknesses
Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average
Equity & inclusion -16 pts 33 here · 50 average
Sustainability (ongoing) -28 pts 50 here · 78 average
Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average
Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Florence. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
CAM — Florence's Voluntary and Court-Referred Programme for Men Who Use Violence · 85
MEET - Media Education for Equity and Tolerance · 56
AI4T Italy — INDIRE's Tutor-Led Online Pathway Trains 275 Teachers in a Randomised Trial (Erasmus+) · 53
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more