evidoria

What works in Havana

All catalogues · Cuba profile

4
evaluated practices
56/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Havana

Cuba's 2022 Family Code was promoted through roughly 79,000 neighbourhood consultation meetings and passed a national referendum on 25 September 2022 with 66.85% approval. IA en el Aula, Cuba's national teacher-training project on ethical generative AI use, opened with a workshop in Havana on 13 December 2025, though the practices do not report participant numbers or independent evaluation of classroom impact. The evidence does not quantify Havana-specific outcomes or implementation progress for either initiative.

Drawn from: Cuba's 2022 Family Code (Código de las Familias) · Joven Club de Computación y Electrónica (JCCE) — Cuba's National Digital-Literacy Network · IA en el Aula — Cuba's National Teacher Training on Ethical Generative AI Use · Cuba's National Reforestation Programme — Plan Turquino-Manati & State Forest Service

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 39 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Sustainability +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Innovation level -24 pts 40 here · 64 average

Evidence of learning impact -30 pts 0 here · 30 average

Scalability & sustainability -33 pts 33 here · 66 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Effectiveness -81 pts 0 here · 81 average

Score profile vs peers

Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 39
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Sustainability
100 · 80
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Transferability / replicability
67 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 66
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 35
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Innovation level
40 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 30
Scalability & sustainability
33 · 66
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Efficiency
0 · 52
Effectiveness
0 · 81

Coloured bar: Havana. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Cuba's 2022 Family Code (Código de las Familias) · 74

Joven Club de Computación y Electrónica (JCCE) — Cuba's National Digital-Literacy Network · 68

IA en el Aula — Cuba's National Teacher Training on Ethical Generative AI Use · 40

Cuba's National Reforestation Programme — Plan Turquino-Manati & State Forest Service · 40

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more