evidoria

What works in Havana

All catalogues · Cuba profile

8
evaluated practices
46/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Havana

The evidence shows that Havana hosted the opening workshop for Cuba's national teacher-training project on ethical generative AI use on 13 December 2025, and was the site where Cuba's nationwide digital-literacy network (JCCE) was founded on 8 September 1987. Beyond these specific institutional events, the practices in the context do not provide quantified information about Havana as a place or substantive claims about its broader characteristics, needs or outcomes.

Drawn from: Cuba's 2022 Family Code (Código de las Familias) · Joven Club de Computación y Electrónica (JCCE) — Cuba's National Digital-Literacy Network · CIGB / BioCubaFarma — Cuba's State Biotechnology Technology-Transfer Engine · IA en el Aula — Cuba's National Teacher Training on Ethical Generative AI Use · Cuba's National Reforestation Programme — Plan Turquino-Manati & State Forest Service · Cuba's 2021 MSME Legalisation — Private Enterprise Returns at Scale, Then Stalls · Cuba's Law on the Personal Identity and Address System — A MININT-Run Biometric Registry With No Independent Oversight · Havana's Organopónicos — Urban Farm Cooperatives Supplying Up to 60% of the City's Fresh Produce

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Teacher capability & pedagogy +29 pts 67 here · 37 average

Impact on gender equality +29 pts 100 here · 71 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Transferability / replicability -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -11 pts 17 here · 28 average

Scalability & sustainability -12 pts 50 here · 62 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Governance, certification & transferability -19 pts 44 here · 64 average

Inclusiveness / equity -26 pts 17 here · 43 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -54 pts 0 here · 54 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -57 pts 17 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -68 pts 0 here · 68 average

Score profile vs peers

Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 37
Impact on gender equality
100 · 71
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 48
Evidence of impact / measured results
56 · 57
Sustainability
75 · 78
Innovation level
58 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Transferability / replicability
50 · 60
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 28
Scalability & sustainability
50 · 62
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Governance, certification & transferability
44 · 64
Inclusiveness / equity
17 · 43
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Efficiency
0 · 33
Evaluation evidence
0 · 49
Transparency, fairness & accountability
0 · 54
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
17 · 74
Effectiveness
0 · 68

Coloured bar: Havana. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Cuba's 2022 Family Code (Código de las Familias) · 74

Joven Club de Computación y Electrónica (JCCE) — Cuba's National Digital-Literacy Network · 68

CIGB / BioCubaFarma — Cuba's State Biotechnology Technology-Transfer Engine · 52

IA en el Aula — Cuba's National Teacher Training on Ethical Generative AI Use · 40

Cuba's National Reforestation Programme — Plan Turquino-Manati & State Forest Service · 40

Cuba's 2021 MSME Legalisation — Private Enterprise Returns at Scale, Then Stalls · 38

Cuba's Law on the Personal Identity and Address System — A MININT-Run Biometric Registry With No Independent Oversight · 27

Havana's Organopónicos — Urban Farm Cooperatives Supplying Up to 60% of the City's Fresh Produce · 27

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more