evidoria

What works in Kathmandu

All catalogues · Nepal profile

18
evaluated practices
55/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 15 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Kathmandu

Kathmandu Living Labs digitised critical urban infrastructure in Kathmandu Valley before the 2015 earthquake, mapping 126,105 buildings, 3,716 km of roads, 2,256 schools and 350 health facilities through a crowdsourced effort involving 1,500+ trained volunteers. When the magnitude-7.8 earthquake struck on 25 April 2015, this open map was rapidly updated with damage and road-passability data that Nepal Army, Nepal Red Cross and international relief agencies used for emergency response. The project later contributed to Nepal's Rural Housing Reconstruction Programme and spawned an independent organisation (Kathmandu Living Labs) that has since run 30+ projects, engaged 5,000+ people and held 200+ events across 40+ partner organisations.

Drawn from: OLE Nepal – E-Paath & E-Pustakalaya Digital Learning for Rural Schools · Kathmandu Living Labs — Open Cities Mapping for Seismic Resilience · Dina — Nepal's First Text-to-Speech Voice Co-Designed With Blind and Low-Vision Youth · Nepal's Equal Inheritance Reform — From the 1995 Dhungana Ruling to the 2017 Civil Code · Nepal's Constitutional 40% Gender Quota in Local Government (2015/2017) · CRMS — Nepal Customs' Machine-Learning Risk Targeting Now Covers 90% of Commercial Trade · One-Stop Crisis Management Centres (OCMC) — Nepal's Hospital-Based Network for Gender-Based Violence Survivors · K-Hub Urban Innovation Programme — Kathmandu Metropolitan City's Government-Run Startup Incubator

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +17 pts 44 here · 28 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, fairness & accountability -9 pts 44 here · 54 average

Scalability beyond pilot -15 pts 48 here · 62 average

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Impact on gender equality -21 pts 50 here · 71 average

Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -30 pts 17 here · 47 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average

Effectiveness -42 pts 25 here · 68 average

Demonstrated reach -51 pts 25 here · 76 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 74
Documented learning
100 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
44 · 28
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Innovation level
68 · 62
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Transferability / replicability
59 · 60
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
44 · 48
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
44 · 48
Evidence of impact / measured public value
53 · 57
Sustainability
73 · 78
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Transparency, fairness & accountability
44 · 54
Scalability beyond pilot
48 · 62
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Impact on gender equality
50 · 71
Curator validation
50 · 73
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Transparency, ethics & data protection
17 · 47
Efficiency
0 · 33
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 37
Effectiveness
25 · 68
Demonstrated reach
25 · 76

Coloured bar: Kathmandu. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

OLE Nepal – E-Paath & E-Pustakalaya Digital Learning for Rural Schools · 96

Kathmandu Living Labs — Open Cities Mapping for Seismic Resilience · 76

Dina — Nepal's First Text-to-Speech Voice Co-Designed With Blind and Low-Vision Youth · 76

Nepal's Equal Inheritance Reform — From the 1995 Dhungana Ruling to the 2017 Civil Code · 74

Nepal's Constitutional 40% Gender Quota in Local Government (2015/2017) · 74

CRMS — Nepal Customs' Machine-Learning Risk Targeting Now Covers 90% of Commercial Trade · 73

One-Stop Crisis Management Centres (OCMC) — Nepal's Hospital-Based Network for Gender-Based Violence Survivors · 63

K-Hub Urban Innovation Programme — Kathmandu Metropolitan City's Government-Run Startup Incubator · 62

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more