What works in Kumasi
All catalogues · Ghana profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Kumasi
Kumasi hosts two significant technology and development initiatives documented in the evidence. KNUST's Technology Consultancy Centre, established in 1972, pioneered Ghana's Intermediate Technology Transfer Unit model by linking university engineering research with informal-sector metalworkers in the Suame Magazine industrial cluster, and this model was later replicated nationally through the GRATIS Foundation network. Farmerline's voice-first Mergdata platform was founded in Kumasi in 2013 and now delivers weather, market-price, and agronomic advice plus digital credit to over 2 million smallholder farmers across roughly 50 countries. The practices document institutional longevity and geographic reach but do not provide comprehensive data on Kumasi's aggregate economic impact or broader development outcomes beyond these two initiatives.
Drawn from: Farmerline Mergdata: Voice-First Digital and Financial Inclusion for Smallholder Farmers · KNUST Technology Consultancy Centre and the GRATIS Foundation Network · Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Programme (GCFRP)
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}Strengths
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +65 pts 100 here · 35 average
Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average
Transferability / demonstrated replication +41 pts 100 here · 59 average
Evidence of impact / measured results +40 pts 100 here · 60 average
Scalability +34 pts 100 here · 66 average
Governance, certification & transferability +34 pts 100 here · 66 average
Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average
Inclusiveness / equity +26 pts 67 here · 41 average
Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +25 pts 33 here · 9 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration +22 pts 100 here · 78 average
Sustainability (ongoing) +20 pts 100 here · 80 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +14 pts 67 here · 53 average
Weaknesses
No standout gaps.
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Kumasi. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Farmerline Mergdata: Voice-First Digital and Financial Inclusion for Smallholder Farmers · 92
KNUST Technology Consultancy Centre and the GRATIS Foundation Network · 91
Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Programme (GCFRP) · 73
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more