evidoria

What works in Leeds

All catalogues · United Kingdom profile

4
evaluated practices
57/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed
1
adoptions elsewhere
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Leeds

Leeds has run two major digital inclusion initiatives. HUGO (Helping U Get On-line) provided digital support to over 4,200 people, created more than 500 new internet users, and supported 86 people into employment through a mobile internet cafe, social-media outreach, and free broadband for low-income social-housing tenants. 100% Digital Leeds, a Leeds City Council-led initiative started in 2018, takes a 'furthest first' approach targeting people with compounding barriers (disability, homelessness, poverty, language barriers and others) and runs a Tablet Lending scheme, Digital Champion training, and secured a £10,000 grant to trial digital-skills learning tools—though quantified outcomes from this initiative are not reported in the available evidence.

Drawn from: HUGO (Helping U Get On-Line) · Signapse — AI-Generated British Sign Language Announcements on the UK's State-Owned Railways · West Yorkshire Police's AI Domestic-Abuse Risk Tool Tested Inside the ICO's Regulatory Sandbox · 100% Digital Leeds

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Sustainability (ongoing) +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +17 pts 83 here · 66 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Weaknesses

Scalability beyond pilot -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Documented learning -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach -25 pts 50 here · 75 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -27 pts 33 here · 60 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 80
Governance, capability & sustainability
83 · 66
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 59
Innovation level
70 · 64
Scalability beyond pilot
50 · 66
Documented learning
50 · 73
Demonstrated reach
50 · 75
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 60
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36

Coloured bar: Leeds. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

HUGO (Helping U Get On-Line) · 76

Signapse — AI-Generated British Sign Language Announcements on the UK's State-Owned Railways · 60

West Yorkshire Police's AI Domestic-Abuse Risk Tool Tested Inside the ICO's Regulatory Sandbox · 60

100% Digital Leeds · 32

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more