What works in Lomé
All catalogues · Togo profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}Strengths
Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value +40 pts 100 here · 60 average
Innovation level +36 pts 100 here · 64 average
Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average
Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average
Transferability / demonstrated replication +24 pts 83 here · 59 average
Sustainability (ongoing) +20 pts 100 here · 80 average
Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average
Weaknesses
Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average
Evidence of learning impact -30 pts 0 here · 30 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy -39 pts 0 here · 39 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection -50 pts 0 here · 50 average
Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average
Curator validation -75 pts 0 here · 75 average
Effectiveness -81 pts 0 here · 81 average
Evaluated outcomes -84 pts 0 here · 84 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Lomé. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Novissi: AI-Targeted Digital Cash Transfers and Togo's ASTRE Social Registry · 100
Novissi — AI-targeted emergency cash transfers in Togo · 80
Legislated Gender Parity in Candidate Lists — Togo's 2013 Electoral Code (Article 220) · 52
Togo x Kira Learning — National Free AI, Coding & Digital English Programme · 20
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more