What works in Mbarara
All catalogues · Uganda profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Mbarara
The evidence shows three distinct interventions in Mbarara district. Trees for Global Benefits engaged 50,000+ smallholders across 34,000 hectares of agroforestry over 20 years, generating ~7.5 million tonnes of CO2 and US$8.7 million in performance-based payments to farmers. Nile Breweries and WWF have restored 80.3 hectares of riverbank along a 27 km stretch of the River Rwizi since 2019, with 1,076 households adopting soil-conservation trenches, though water-quality improvements remain unverified. A machine-learning dropout-risk model developed in six Mbarara/Isingiro schools identified financial hardship, travel distance and bullying as leading risk factors for secondary-school dropout, though the authors note the model's moderate accuracy precludes autonomous high-stakes use.
Drawn from: Trees for Global Benefits (Plan Vivo, Uganda) · Nile Breweries–WWF River Rwizi Catchment Restoration (Uganda) · A Context-Aware Machine-Learning Early-Warning Model for O-Level Dropout Risk in Southwestern Uganda
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +22 pts 50 here · 28 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average
Governance, certification & transferability +20 pts 83 here · 64 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +11 pts 17 here · 6 average
Weaknesses
Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average
Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy -37 pts 0 here · 37 average
Scalability & sustainability -62 pts 0 here · 62 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Mbarara. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Trees for Global Benefits (Plan Vivo, Uganda) · 73
Nile Breweries–WWF River Rwizi Catchment Restoration (Uganda) · 33
A Context-Aware Machine-Learning Early-Warning Model for O-Level Dropout Risk in Southwestern Uganda · 20
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ushahidi — Kenya's Crowdsourced Crisis-Mapping Platform · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more