evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

BarrierBreak — Mumbai's Disability-Led Digital Accessibility and Inclusive Design Consultancy

India · Mumbai · See the India profile · See the Mumbai profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 24% 92/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Founded in 2004 by Shilpi Kapoor, Mumbai's BarrierBreak employs testers and consultants with disabilities to audit and co-design digital products for clients worldwide, running 200,000+ accessibility-testing hours a year and holding India's DEPwD auditor empanelment.

200,000+
Accessibility-testing hours per year

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
BarrierBreak
Period
2004–present
Keywords
digital accessibility, consulting, assistive technology

Context

BarrierBreak is a digital accessibility and inclusive-design consultancy founded in Mumbai in 2004 by Shilpi Kapoor, built on the principle that people with disabilities should lead the evaluation of products meant to serve them.

Activities

The 'People First' testing model embeds testers and consultants with disabilities directly in client engagements; one documented study had ten participants across the low-vision-to-blind spectrum evaluate the Reserve Bank of India's redesigned accessible coins.

Results

BarrierBreak reports running more than 200,000 hours of accessibility testing annually and is empanelled by India's DEPwD as a government web-accessibility auditor.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Commercial consultancy business (client-funded); specific engagement costs not published.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Founded 2004 in Mumbai.
Staffing & skills
testers and consultants with disabilities embedded directly in client engagements ('People First' model)

Conditions for success

  • government auditor empanelment (India's DEPwD)
  • disability-led testing model rather than external expert evaluation

Common failure modes

  • testing-volume and staffing figures self-reported, not independently audited

Commonly funded by

Own resources / municipal budget

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful