evidoria

What works in Nuku'alofa

All catalogues · Tonga profile

5
evaluated practices
47/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 5 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Nuku'alofa

[Nuku'alofa] hosted a 3-day 'OER for STEM Education' workshop in October 2024 at the University of the South Pacific's Tonga campus, training 40 secondary STEM teachers in generative AI and open educational resources as part of a regional programme reaching over 800 educators. The city also benefited from submarine cable infrastructure completed in 2018, which lifted broadband penetration from under 2% to 50% and cut international bandwidth wholesale costs from US$1,500–3,500 to approximately US$75 per Mbps per month. These projects reflect investments in digital connectivity and educator capacity, though the STEM training impact on student outcomes has not yet been independently evaluated, and the evidence does not describe other dimensions of Nuku'alofa's development or services.

Drawn from: Tonga–Fiji Submarine Cable & TongaPass Digital ID Programme · Tonga's Family Protection Legal Aid Centre — Free Legal Aid and Digital Access to Justice for GBV Survivors · OER for STEM Education — Generative-AI Teacher Training in Nuku'alofa, Tonga · Tonga's Ridge to Reef Community Grants — Mangrove Restoration & Coastal Resilience · TongaGPT — Tonga's World Bank-Funded AI Assistant, Announced but Not Yet Confirmed Live

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 39 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Governance, certification & transferability -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -18 pts 33 here · 51 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Transferability / replicability -26 pts 33 here · 59 average

Scalability & sustainability -33 pts 33 here · 66 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -50 pts 0 here · 50 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -60 pts 0 here · 60 average

Effectiveness -81 pts 0 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality -83 pts 0 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes -84 pts 0 here · 84 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 39
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 80
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 35
Innovation level
60 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Governance, certification & transferability
50 · 66
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 51
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Transferability / replicability
33 · 59
Scalability & sustainability
33 · 66
Transparency, ethics & data protection
0 · 50
Efficiency
0 · 52
Evidence of impact / measured public value
0 · 60
Effectiveness
0 · 81
Impact on gender equality
0 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 84

Coloured bar: Nuku'alofa. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Tonga–Fiji Submarine Cable & TongaPass Digital ID Programme · 92

Tonga's Family Protection Legal Aid Centre — Free Legal Aid and Digital Access to Justice for GBV Survivors · 48

OER for STEM Education — Generative-AI Teacher Training in Nuku'alofa, Tonga · 40

Tonga's Ridge to Reef Community Grants — Mangrove Restoration & Coastal Resilience · 33

TongaGPT — Tonga's World Bank-Funded AI Assistant, Announced but Not Yet Confirmed Live · 20

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more