evidoria

What works in Oslo

All catalogues · Norway profile

30
evaluated practices
70/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 30 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +47 pts 100 here · 53 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +32 pts 67 here · 35 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 39 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +20 pts 73 here · 54 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +13 pts 92 here · 78 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Curator validation +8 pts 83 here · 75 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Evaluation evidence -11 pts 25 here · 36 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -18 pts 33 here · 51 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Score profile vs peers

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 53
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 35
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 39
Documented learning
100 · 73
Transparency, fairness & accountability
73 · 54
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
92 · 78
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Curator validation
83 · 75
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Sustainability (ongoing)
86 · 80
Governance, capability & sustainability
72 · 66
Evidence of impact / measured results
65 · 60
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Scalability
67 · 66
Demonstrated reach
75 · 75
Innovation level
64 · 64
Efficiency
50 · 52
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 41
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Evaluation evidence
25 · 36
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 51
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54

Coloured bar: Oslo. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Norway's Mandatory Corporate Board Gender Quota — ASA Act Amendment 2003 · 100

Norway's Fedrekvote (Father's Quota) — Reserved Parental Leave for Fathers · 100

Norway's Alternativ til Vold (ATV) — Therapeutic Treatment Programme for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators · 96

Norway's Mandatory Gender Pay Equity Survey — Lønnskartlegging under the Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act (2018/2020) · 89

Seniornett Norge – Nationwide Peer Digital Training Network for Older Adults · 88

Norway's National AI Regulatory Sandbox — Testing High-Risk and Generative AI Before Deployment · 87

Norway's Gender-Neutral Military Conscription (Allmenn Verneplikt) · 82

Oslo Business Region — City-Owned Startup & Scaleup Growth Agency · 81

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more