evidoria

What works in Norway

All catalogues

44
evaluated practices
69/100
average quality score
2%
strong evidence, of 44 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Norway

Drawn from: Divvun & Giellatekno — Sámi Language Technology Infrastructure · Norway's Mandatory Corporate Board Gender Quota — ASA Act Amendment 2003 · Norway's Fedrekvote (Father's Quota) — Reserved Parental Leave for Fathers · Norway's Alternativ til Vold (ATV) — Therapeutic Treatment Programme for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators · SMILE — Co-Creating a Smart Living Ecosystem for Ageing in Place · Norway's Universal Design of ICT Supervision — Mandatory WCAG Enforcement with Coercive Fines · Norway's Mandatory Gender Pay Equity Survey — Lønnskartlegging under the Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act (2018/2020) · Seniornett Norge – Nationwide Peer Digital Training Network for Older Adults

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Evidence of learning impact +22 pts 50 here · 28 average

Evaluation evidence +22 pts 67 here · 45 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +21 pts 58 here · 37 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +20 pts 73 here · 54 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Sustainability / continuity +12 pts 90 here · 78 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +12 pts 88 here · 76 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +11 pts 58 here · 48 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Curator validation +9 pts 83 here · 74 average

Weaknesses

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Inclusiveness / equity -17 pts 25 here · 42 average

Score profile vs peers

Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Evidence of learning impact
50 · 28
Evaluation evidence
67 · 45
Teacher capability & pedagogy
58 · 37
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Transparency, fairness & accountability
73 · 54
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 51
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Sustainability / continuity
90 · 78
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
88 · 76
Transparency, ethics & data protection
58 · 48
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Curator validation
83 · 74
Governance, capability & sustainability
71 · 64
Efficiency
50 · 44
Transferability / demonstrated replication
64 · 60
Evidence of impact / measured results
62 · 59
Scalability
67 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 31
Innovation
64 · 63
Equity & inclusion
50 · 52
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 50
Inclusiveness / equity
25 · 42

Coloured bar: Norway. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Divvun & Giellatekno — Sámi Language Technology Infrastructure · 100

Norway's Mandatory Corporate Board Gender Quota — ASA Act Amendment 2003 · 100

Norway's Fedrekvote (Father's Quota) — Reserved Parental Leave for Fathers · 100

Norway's Alternativ til Vold (ATV) — Therapeutic Treatment Programme for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators · 96

SMILE — Co-Creating a Smart Living Ecosystem for Ageing in Place · 96

Norway's Universal Design of ICT Supervision — Mandatory WCAG Enforcement with Coercive Fines · 92

Norway's Mandatory Gender Pay Equity Survey — Lønnskartlegging under the Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act (2018/2020) · 89

Seniornett Norge – Nationwide Peer Digital Training Network for Older Adults · 88

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Norway concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence

Ushahidi — Kenya's Crowdsourced Crisis-Mapping Platform · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more