evidoria

What works in Norway

All catalogues

60
evaluated practices
65/100
average quality score
2%
strong evidence, of 48 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Norway

Drawn from: Divvun & Giellatekno — Sámi Language Technology Infrastructure · Norway's Mandatory Corporate Board Gender Quota — ASA Act Amendment 2003 · Norway's Fedrekvote (Father's Quota) — Reserved Parental Leave for Fathers · Norway's Alternativ til Vold (ATV) — Therapeutic Treatment Programme for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators · SMILE — Co-Creating a Smart Living Ecosystem for Ageing in Place · Norway's Universal Design of ICT Supervision — Mandatory WCAG Enforcement with Coercive Fines · Statens Barnehus — Norway's National Network of Children's Houses for Child Victims of Violence and Abuse · Norway's Mandatory Gender Pay Equity Survey — Lønnskartlegging under the Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act (2018/2020)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Transparency, fairness & accountability +25 pts 79 here · 54 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evaluation evidence +22 pts 71 here · 49 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +18 pts 56 here · 38 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +14 pts 61 here · 47 average

Effectiveness +14 pts 80 here · 66 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +12 pts 85 here · 74 average

Documented learning +11 pts 86 here · 74 average

Impact on gender equality +10 pts 80 here · 70 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +10 pts 58 here · 48 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -17 pts 26 here · 43 average

Score profile vs peers

Transparency, fairness & accountability
79 · 54
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evaluation evidence
71 · 49
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Teacher capability & pedagogy
56 · 38
Transparency, ethics & data protection
61 · 47
Effectiveness
80 · 66
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
85 · 74
Documented learning
86 · 74
Impact on gender equality
80 · 70
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
58 · 48
Governance, capability & sustainability
71 · 64
Curator validation
80 · 73
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 27
Sustainability / continuity
84 · 78
Transferability / demonstrated replication
65 · 60
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 48
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
90 · 89
Innovation
62 · 62
Scalability
61 · 62
Efficiency
30 · 32
Evidence of impact / measured results
54 · 57
Equity & inclusion
44 · 50
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Achievement / evidence
80 · 87
Inclusiveness / equity
26 · 43

Coloured bar: Norway. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Divvun & Giellatekno — Sámi Language Technology Infrastructure · 100

Norway's Mandatory Corporate Board Gender Quota — ASA Act Amendment 2003 · 100

Norway's Fedrekvote (Father's Quota) — Reserved Parental Leave for Fathers · 100

Norway's Alternativ til Vold (ATV) — Therapeutic Treatment Programme for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators · 96

SMILE — Co-Creating a Smart Living Ecosystem for Ageing in Place · 96

Norway's Universal Design of ICT Supervision — Mandatory WCAG Enforcement with Coercive Fines · 92

Statens Barnehus — Norway's National Network of Children's Houses for Child Victims of Violence and Abuse · 89

Norway's Mandatory Gender Pay Equity Survey — Lønnskartlegging under the Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act (2018/2020) · 89

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Norway concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

work2future · fit 75/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more