evidoria

What works in Panama City

All catalogues · Panama profile

7
evaluated practices
56/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 7 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +61 pts 100 here · 39 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +49 pts 100 here · 51 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +32 pts 67 here · 35 average

Inclusiveness / equity +26 pts 67 here · 41 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Innovation level -11 pts 53 here · 64 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Governance, certification & transferability -22 pts 44 here · 66 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -24 pts 56 here · 80 average

Transferability / replicability -26 pts 33 here · 59 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Documented learning -73 pts 0 here · 73 average

Effectiveness -81 pts 0 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality -83 pts 0 here · 83 average

Achievement / evidence -93 pts 0 here · 93 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Teacher capability & pedagogy
100 · 39
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 51
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 35
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 41
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 78
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 60
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Scalability & sustainability
67 · 66
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Innovation level
53 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Governance, certification & transferability
44 · 66
Sustainability (ongoing)
56 · 80
Transferability / replicability
33 · 59
Efficiency
0 · 52
Documented learning
0 · 73
Effectiveness
0 · 81
Impact on gender equality
0 · 83
Achievement / evidence
0 · 93

Coloured bar: Panama City. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Internet para Todos – Red Nacional Internet 2.0 (Panama) · 68

Ciudad del Saber — Converting a US Military Base into an Innovation District · 67

Entre Pares 5.0 — Panama's National Teacher AI and Digital Literacy Cascade Programme · 67

Panamá Conecta's AI-Built Fuel Subsidy Platform — Rapid Development, National-Scale Uptake · 53

Panama Canal Authority Watershed Reforestation Incentive Programme · 53

Dr. R.O.S.A. — Panama's WhatsApp AI Chatbot for COVID-19 Screening and Its Quiet Shutdown · 47

Gender Parity Law and Its 'Escape Clause' — Panama's Electoral Code · 37

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more