evidoria

What works in Panama

All catalogues

15
evaluated practices
53/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 10 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Panama

Panama has undertaken significant infrastructure and innovation investments: a national free public Wi-Fi programme deployed 1,320 access points reaching an estimated 80–84% of the population, and a converted US military base now hosts 260+ resident organisations generating 11,378 jobs and ~$314M in annual value-added. The government has also prioritised digital competency in education, with 1,550 lead teachers cascade-training roughly 52,000 in-service teachers across all 16 educational regions in 2025. However, web accessibility remains a compliance challenge: despite Law 15 mandating accessible public-sector websites, a 2018 audit of 46 sites found 14,571 WCAG 2.0 errors.

Drawn from: Panama's Law 15 Web-Accessibility Mandate Meets a 14,571-Error Reality Check · Internet para Todos – Red Nacional Internet 2.0 (Panama) · Ciudad del Saber — Converting a US Military Base into an Innovation District · Entre Pares 5.0 — Panama's National Teacher AI and Digital Literacy Cascade Programme · Panamá Conecta's AI-Built Fuel Subsidy Platform — Rapid Development, National-Scale Uptake · Panama Canal Authority Watershed Reforestation Incentive Programme · SEM — Panama's Multinational Headquarters Regime · Technovation Girls Panamá — SENACYT's National AI App-Building Programme Reaches Its First Global Finalists

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +19 pts 50 here · 31 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +18 pts 56 here · 37 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Innovation level -18 pts 45 here · 63 average

Governance, certification & transferability -20 pts 44 here · 64 average

Transferability / replicability -22 pts 38 here · 59 average

Documented learning -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Achievement / evidence -91 pts 0 here · 91 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
50 · 31
Teacher capability & pedagogy
56 · 37
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Inclusiveness / equity
44 · 42
Scalability & sustainability
63 · 64
Sustainability (ongoing)
78 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured public value
57 · 59
Transparency, fairness & accountability
50 · 54
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 28
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 50
Innovation level
45 · 63
Governance, certification & transferability
44 · 64
Transferability / replicability
38 · 59
Documented learning
50 · 74
Efficiency
0 · 44
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80
Achievement / evidence
0 · 91

Coloured bar: Panama. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Panama's Law 15 Web-Accessibility Mandate Meets a 14,571-Error Reality Check · 84

Ciudad del Saber — Panama's 25-Year Conversion of a Former U.S. Military Base into an Innovation District · 71

Internet para Todos – Red Nacional Internet 2.0 (Panama) · 68

Ciudad del Saber — Converting a US Military Base into an Innovation District · 67

Entre Pares 5.0 — Panama's National Teacher AI and Digital Literacy Cascade Programme · 67

Panamá Conecta's AI-Built Fuel Subsidy Platform — Rapid Development, National-Scale Uptake · 53

Panama Canal Authority Watershed Reforestation Incentive Programme · 53

SEM — Panama's Multinational Headquarters Regime · 48

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Panama concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more