evidoria

What works in Paramaribo

All catalogues · Suriname profile

5
evaluated practices
59/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 5 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Paramaribo

Better Prepared Suriname's Responsible-AI Teacher Training conducted a national responsible-AI teacher-training pilot in Paramaribo in March 2026, partnering with KU Leuven and Suriname's Ministry of Education. An online information session on 2 March 2026 targeted 250 teachers but drew 180 registrations and roughly 130 devices logged in, followed by a smaller hands-on workshop of 30 selected teachers on 23 March 2026. The shortfall from the target was partly attributed to device-sharing and connectivity constraints at schools, and the pilot remains a one-off with no confirmed continuation confirmed at the time of reporting.

Drawn from: Suriname e-ID — National Digital Identity Card · Suriname's Gender Vision Policy (2021-2035) and Rising Women's Representation · Better Prepared Suriname's Responsible-AI Teacher Training — Paramaribo · Suriname National REDD+ Programme — Jurisdictional Forest Carbon Results-Based Payments · Suriname's E-Visa AI Chatbot — Launched Alongside a Public Warning About Its Own Governance Gaps

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +65 pts 100 here · 35 average

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +61 pts 100 here · 39 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +46 pts 100 here · 54 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Sustainability +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Transferability / replicability -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Innovation level -24 pts 40 here · 64 average

Evidence of learning impact -30 pts 0 here · 30 average

Scalability beyond pilot -33 pts 33 here · 66 average

Governance, certification & transferability -33 pts 33 here · 66 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -51 pts 0 here · 51 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -60 pts 0 here · 60 average

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
100 · 35
Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Teacher capability & pedagogy
100 · 39
Transparency, fairness & accountability
100 · 54
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Sustainability
100 · 80
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Transferability / replicability
50 · 59
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Innovation level
40 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 30
Scalability beyond pilot
33 · 66
Governance, certification & transferability
33 · 66
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 51
Efficiency
0 · 52
Evidence of impact / measured public value
0 · 60

Coloured bar: Paramaribo. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Suriname e-ID — National Digital Identity Card · 88

Suriname's Gender Vision Policy (2021-2035) and Rising Women's Representation · 85

Better Prepared Suriname's Responsible-AI Teacher Training — Paramaribo · 47

Suriname National REDD+ Programme — Jurisdictional Forest Carbon Results-Based Payments · 40

Suriname's E-Visa AI Chatbot — Launched Alongside a Public Warning About Its Own Governance Gaps · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more