What works in Suriname
All catalogues
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Suriname
Suriname has pursued digital identity adoption through a binding legal deadline, achieving over 320,000 valid e-IDs by April 2022 — more than half the population — though interior communities still lag in access. Women's political representation has risen substantially without legislated quotas, reaching 31.37% of National Assembly seats by 2024–2025, up from roughly 10% in 2010, supported by the government's Gender Vision Policy (2021–2035). The country is developing export capacity through an EU/Caribbean Development Bank programme training 60 MSMEs, though outcomes data remain unpublished, and has piloted responsible-AI teacher training with 180 teachers registered and 30 completing hands-on workshops, though continuation is unconfirmed.
Drawn from: Suriname e-ID — National Digital Identity Card · Suriname's Gender Vision Policy (2021-2035) and Rising Women's Representation · Suriname's EU–CDB MSME Export-Readiness Programme · Better Prepared Suriname's Responsible-AI Teacher Training — Paramaribo · Suriname National REDD+ Programme — Jurisdictional Forest Carbon Results-Based Payments · Suriname's E-Visa AI Chatbot — Launched Alongside a Public Warning About Its Own Governance Gaps
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +69 pts 100 here · 31 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy +63 pts 100 here · 37 average
Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability +46 pts 100 here · 54 average
Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Inclusiveness / equity +25 pts 67 here · 42 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average
Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average
Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average
Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Weaknesses
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average
Equity & inclusion -19 pts 33 here · 52 average
Innovation level -26 pts 37 here · 63 average
Evidence of learning impact -28 pts 0 here · 28 average
Scalability beyond pilot -30 pts 33 here · 64 average
Governance, certification & transferability -31 pts 33 here · 64 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value -42 pts 17 here · 59 average
Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -50 pts 0 here · 50 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Suriname. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Suriname e-ID — National Digital Identity Card · 88
Suriname's Gender Vision Policy (2021-2035) and Rising Women's Representation · 85
Suriname's EU–CDB MSME Export-Readiness Programme · 52
Better Prepared Suriname's Responsible-AI Teacher Training — Paramaribo · 47
Suriname National REDD+ Programme — Jurisdictional Forest Carbon Results-Based Payments · 40
Suriname's E-Visa AI Chatbot — Launched Alongside a Public Warning About Its Own Governance Gaps · 33
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Cities with evaluated practice
Where the documented practice in Suriname concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more