evidoria

What works in Port Moresby

All catalogues · Papua New Guinea profile

6
evaluated practices
55/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Port Moresby

One practice directly reports data from Port Moresby (the Waigani/National Capital District): the [Family and Sexual Violence Units] recorded 2,013 family-and-sexual-violence cases, resulting in 195 arrests, 11 convictions, and 960 referrals to health, legal and social services in a single reporting period. The [MyICSA Analysis Engine] is integrated into PNG's national eVisa platform and processes visa applications nationwide, including from Port Moresby's Immigration and Citizenship Services Authority, cutting processing time from up to two weeks to under four minutes—though the practice does not isolate Port Moresby-specific visa volumes. Beyond these two services, the evidence does not quantify Port Moresby-specific outcomes for the rural communications or REDD+ programmes.

Drawn from: Papua New Guinea Rural Communications Project · Papua New Guinea National REDD+ Programme — GCF Results-Based Payment · Family and Sexual Violence Units - Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary · MyICSA Analysis Engine — Papua New Guinea's AI-Powered Visa Processing System · UPNG's Campus-Wide AI Survey Sparks Curriculum Overhaul in Port Moresby · EduNEX & NEXA AI — Papua New Guinea's National AI-Powered Learning Platform Launch

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +65 pts 100 here · 35 average

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +25 pts 33 here · 9 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +14 pts 67 here · 53 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Transferability / replicability -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Scalability beyond pilot -10 pts 56 here · 66 average

Evidence of learning impact -13 pts 17 here · 30 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -18 pts 33 here · 51 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -23 pts 17 here · 39 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Effectiveness -81 pts 0 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality -83 pts 0 here · 83 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
100 · 35
Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
33 · 9
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 53
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 60
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 66
Innovation level
60 · 64
Transferability / replicability
50 · 59
Scalability beyond pilot
56 · 66
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 30
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 51
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Teacher capability & pedagogy
17 · 39
Efficiency
0 · 52
Effectiveness
0 · 81
Impact on gender equality
0 · 83

Coloured bar: Port Moresby. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Papua New Guinea Rural Communications Project · 92

Papua New Guinea National REDD+ Programme — GCF Results-Based Payment · 67

Family and Sexual Violence Units - Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary · 63

MyICSA Analysis Engine — Papua New Guinea's AI-Powered Visa Processing System · 47

UPNG's Campus-Wide AI Survey Sparks Curriculum Overhaul in Port Moresby · 40

EduNEX & NEXA AI — Papua New Guinea's National AI-Powered Learning Platform Launch · 20

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more