evidoria

What works in Papua New Guinea

All catalogues

15
evaluated practices
51/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 8 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Papua New Guinea

Drawn from: Papua New Guinea Rural Communications Project · Digital Bank ID Card Pilot — Village-Chief-Vouched Biometric Identity for Unbanked Farmers in Papua New Guinea · SWEEP-TB — AI Chest X-Ray Screening Confronts Hidden Tuberculosis on Daru Island, Papua New Guinea · Papua New Guinea National REDD+ Programme — GCF Results-Based Payment · Family and Sexual Violence Units - Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary · SevisPass — Papua New Guinea's TECH5-Built National Digital Identity System · SME Access to Finance Project — Papua New Guinea's Risk-Share Loan Guarantee Facility, and Its Overstated Results · Shortlisting in 30 Minutes — Papua New Guinea's AI-Driven Digital Recruitment System

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +47 pts 78 here · 31 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +25 pts 67 here · 42 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Equity & inclusion -11 pts 42 here · 52 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Scalability beyond pilot -16 pts 48 here · 64 average

Evidence of learning impact -20 pts 8 here · 28 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -39 pts 11 here · 50 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
78 · 31
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 42
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 59
Transparency, fairness & accountability
58 · 54
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
11 · 7
Transferability / replicability
56 · 59
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Innovation level
58 · 63
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
44 · 50
Governance, certification & transferability
57 · 64
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Equity & inclusion
42 · 52
Sustainability (ongoing)
67 · 78
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Scalability beyond pilot
48 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
8 · 28
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
11 · 50
Efficiency
0 · 44
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80

Coloured bar: Papua New Guinea. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Papua New Guinea Rural Communications Project · 92

Digital Bank ID Card Pilot — Village-Chief-Vouched Biometric Identity for Unbanked Farmers in Papua New Guinea · 76

SWEEP-TB — AI Chest X-Ray Screening Confronts Hidden Tuberculosis on Daru Island, Papua New Guinea · 67

Papua New Guinea National REDD+ Programme — GCF Results-Based Payment · 67

Family and Sexual Violence Units - Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary · 63

SevisPass — Papua New Guinea's TECH5-Built National Digital Identity System · 60

SME Access to Finance Project — Papua New Guinea's Risk-Share Loan Guarantee Facility, and Its Overstated Results · 57

Shortlisting in 30 Minutes — Papua New Guinea's AI-Driven Digital Recruitment System · 53

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Papua New Guinea concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more