What works in Poznań
All catalogues · Poland profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Poznań
Poznań hosts Poland's first market-operating science park, founded in 1995 by the Adam Mickiewicz University Foundation, which now accommodates 50–80 resident companies, has trained over 22,000 people, and channelled more than PLN 100 million in EU co-financed R&D investment. The city's municipal water utility Aquanet operates a retention-linked stormwater fee discount scheme that reduces charges by roughly 15% for properties retaining over 20% of rainfall on-site, paired with municipal grants covering up to 80% of retention-device costs. These practices reflect Poznań's role as a centre for university-linked innovation and an early adopter of market-based pricing for water management, though the evidence does not quantify job creation or the uptake of the stormwater discount scheme.
Drawn from: Poznań Science and Technology Park — University-Owned Innovation Hub · INSENSION - Personalised intelligent platform enabling interaction with digital services to individuals with profound and multiple learning disabilities · Poznań Science and Technology Park (PPNT) — Adam Mickiewicz University Foundation · Poznań's Retention-Linked Stormwater Fee — Aquanet's Avoided-Cost Discount Scheme (Poland)
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +52 pts 100 here · 48 average
Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average
Transferability / demonstrated replication +23 pts 83 here · 60 average
Evidence of impact / measured results +9 pts 67 here · 57 average
Weaknesses
Sustainability (ongoing) -12 pts 67 here · 78 average
Scalability -12 pts 50 here · 62 average
Inclusiveness / equity -26 pts 17 here · 43 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -28 pts 0 here · 28 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -48 pts 0 here · 48 average
Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Poznań. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Poznań Science and Technology Park — University-Owned Innovation Hub · 67
Poznań Science and Technology Park (PPNT) — Adam Mickiewicz University Foundation · 57
Poznań's Retention-Linked Stormwater Fee — Aquanet's Avoided-Cost Discount Scheme (Poland) · 33
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more