evidoria

What works in Prague

All catalogues · Czechia profile

12
evaluated practices
57/100
average quality score
8%
strong evidence, of 12 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Prague

Prague is developing affordable housing for public-service workers through the Prague Key Worker Affordable Housing (DBČS) programme, which has secured delivery of more than 700 apartments at roughly 20% below market rent, with occupancy scheduled for 2025–2026 and a €60 million EIB loan backing the initiative across four city sites. The city also supports female entrepreneurship through Future Females Prague, a partnership with the University of New York in Prague that offers workshops, mentorship and business-development strategy work to women in male-dominated sectors like tech and IT. However, the evidence provided does not yet include outcome data on tenant retention or the impact of female entrepreneurship support, as construction and programme rollout remain ongoing.

Drawn from: Future Females Prague · Prague Key Worker Affordable Housing (DBČS) · Czech Regional AI Chatbots — HypeDigitaly deployment across five government websites · LLM Inflation Forecasting Pilot — the Czech National Bank's Public Test of AI Against Its Core Model · Czech Republic AIDIG — National AI Competence Programme for Teachers · CzechInvest · Expat Centre Prague — Prague City Hall's one-stop welcome service for international professionals · Expat Centre Prague — City Hall's Official One-Stop Service for International Professionals

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +49 pts 100 here · 51 average

Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 39 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Inclusiveness / equity +17 pts 58 here · 41 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Governance, capability & sustainability -8 pts 58 here · 66 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Innovation level -12 pts 52 here · 64 average

Evidence of learning impact -13 pts 17 here · 30 average

Scalability -14 pts 52 here · 66 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -20 pts 58 here · 78 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -35 pts 0 here · 35 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Documented learning -73 pts 0 here · 73 average

Score profile vs peers

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 51
Efficiency
100 · 52
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 39
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Inclusiveness / equity
58 · 41
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Sustainability
83 · 80
Transferability / replicability
62 · 59
Transparency, fairness & accountability
56 · 54
Equity & inclusion
50 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured results
52 · 60
Governance, capability & sustainability
58 · 66
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Innovation level
52 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 30
Scalability
52 · 66
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
58 · 78
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 35
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Documented learning
0 · 73

Coloured bar: Prague. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Future Females Prague · 93

Prague Key Worker Affordable Housing (DBČS) · 76

Czech Regional AI Chatbots — HypeDigitaly deployment across five government websites · 67

LLM Inflation Forecasting Pilot — the Czech National Bank's Public Test of AI Against Its Core Model · 60

Czech Republic AIDIG — National AI Competence Programme for Teachers · 60

CzechInvest · 57

Expat Centre Prague — Prague City Hall's one-stop welcome service for international professionals · 57

Expat Centre Prague — City Hall's Official One-Stop Service for International Professionals · 57

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more