evidoria

What works in Czechia

All catalogues

40
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
11%
strong evidence, of 38 assessed
5
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Czechia

Drawn from: Future Females Prague · Gender Equality Plan at University of Pardubice · Promotion of gender balance in the ETA Programme · Promotion of gender balance in the ZÉTA Programme · Closing the gender gap in the Czech Republic · Czech Republic's DIA Accessibility-Statement Monitoring: 25.8% to 15.7% to 56.6% · JIC — South Moravian Innovation Centre (Brno, Czech Republic) · Political participation of women in the Czech Republic

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +57 pts 100 here · 43 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Effectiveness +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +18 pts 56 here · 37 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +11 pts 87 here · 76 average

Transferability / replicability +10 pts 69 here · 60 average

Achievement / evidence +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +8 pts 56 here · 48 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Curator validation -21 pts 53 here · 74 average

Evaluation evidence -31 pts 14 here · 45 average

Documented learning -45 pts 29 here · 74 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 43
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 50
Effectiveness
100 · 76
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Teacher capability & pedagogy
56 · 37
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 51
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
87 · 76
Transferability / replicability
69 · 60
Achievement / evidence
100 · 90
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transparency, ethics & data protection
56 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Sustainability
83 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured results
63 · 59
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 30
Scalability
65 · 64
Innovation level
61 · 63
Governance, capability & sustainability
62 · 64
Demonstrated reach
71 · 76
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Transparency, fairness & accountability
47 · 54
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Curator validation
53 · 74
Evaluation evidence
14 · 45
Documented learning
29 · 74

Coloured bar: Czechia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Future Females Prague · 93

Gender Equality Plan at University of Pardubice · 89

Promotion of gender balance in the ETA Programme · 89

Promotion of gender balance in the ZÉTA Programme · 89

Czech Republic's DIA Accessibility-Statement Monitoring: 25.8% to 15.7% to 56.6% · 88

JIC — South Moravian Innovation Centre (Brno, Czech Republic) · 86

JIC — South Moravian Innovation Centre (Brno) · 81

JIC — South Moravian Innovation Centre: A Six-Founder Knowledge-Transfer Hub (Brno) · 76

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Czechia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Step-by-Step — Refugee-Redesigned Digital Mental Health App, Trialled Nationally in Lebanon · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more