evidoria

What works in Recife

All catalogues · Brazil profile

3
evaluated practices
72/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 3 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Recife

Recife has emerged as a significant technology and creative-economy hub through Porto Digital, a cluster founded in 2000 that by 2024 hosted 475 companies employing 21,551 people and generating R$ 6.2 billion in revenue, while raising the IT sector's share of Pernambuco's GDP from 1.6% to 4% over 24 years. The city has also deployed assistive technology at scale: Livox, an AI-adaptive communication app, was formally adopted into Recife's public schools with 500 tablets across 111 schools to support students with communication disabilities. These initiatives reflect Recife's focus on regenerating its historic urban core while building inclusive innovation capacity, though the evidence base is strongest for deployment numbers and institutional adoption rather than measured outcomes of social or communication impact.

Drawn from: Porto Digital — ICT & Creative Economy Cluster (Recife) · Porto Digital · Livox — AI-Adaptive Augmentative Communication App Scaled Across Recife's Public Schools

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Equity & inclusion +46 pts 100 here · 54 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 39 average

Transferability / demonstrated replication +24 pts 83 here · 59 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +23 pts 83 here · 60 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Sustainability / continuity +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Scalability +12 pts 78 here · 66 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, ethics & data protection -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Equity & inclusion
100 · 54
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 39
Transferability / demonstrated replication
83 · 59
Evidence of impact / measured results
83 · 60
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 78
Sustainability / continuity
100 · 80
Scalability
78 · 66
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Innovation
67 · 64
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 41
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50

Coloured bar: Recife. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Porto Digital — ICT & Creative Economy Cluster (Recife) · 81

Porto Digital · 76

Livox — AI-Adaptive Augmentative Communication App Scaled Across Recife's Public Schools · 60

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more