evidoria

What works in Rotterdam

All catalogues · Netherlands profile

4
evaluated practices
45/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Rotterdam

Rotterdam is advancing circular-economy and climate-adaptation strategies through innovative urban initiatives. BlueCity, a repurposed swimming-pool complex, has incubated 55+ circular-economy entrepreneurs since 2015, with 90% of renovation materials reused locally, demonstrating how a single building can anchor a city's broader circular strategy. The city's green-roof subsidy programme has installed 360,000 m² of green roofs by 2018 as a cost-effective alternative to sewer expansion for stormwater management, targeting 800,000 m² by 2030. The evidence base documents administrative outcomes and self-reported figures rather than independently audited impact measurement.

Drawn from: BlueCity — circular-economy incubator (Rotterdam) · Rotterdam Green Roof Subsidy Programme — Avoided-Cost Stormwater Retention Payments · Coderdojo · Women in Leadership – Purpose-driven leadership

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Governance, certification & transferability +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Inclusiveness / equity +26 pts 67 here · 41 average

Transferability / replicability +24 pts 83 here · 59 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Innovation level +16 pts 80 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Sustainability -13 pts 67 here · 80 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Curator validation -30 pts 45 here · 75 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -35 pts 0 here · 35 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Documented learning -73 pts 0 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach -75 pts 0 here · 75 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -90 pts 0 here · 90 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Governance, certification & transferability
100 · 66
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 41
Transferability / replicability
83 · 59
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 78
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Innovation level
80 · 64
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 60
Scalability
67 · 66
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Sustainability
67 · 80
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Curator validation
45 · 75
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 35
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Documented learning
0 · 73
Demonstrated reach
0 · 75
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 90

Coloured bar: Rotterdam. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

BlueCity — circular-economy incubator (Rotterdam) · 86

Rotterdam Green Roof Subsidy Programme — Avoided-Cost Stormwater Retention Payments · 40

Coderdojo · 32

Women in Leadership – Purpose-driven leadership · 24

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more