evidoria

What works in Rotterdam

All catalogues · Netherlands profile

10
evaluated practices
50/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 7 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Rotterdam

Drawn from: BlueCity — circular-economy incubator (Rotterdam) · Pronto — Port of Rotterdam Authority's AI-Assisted Port Call Optimisation Platform · Gemeente Rotterdam's Municipal Algorithm Register — 31 AI Systems Disclosed Under a Shared European City Standard · Connecting Delta Cities — Rotterdam's Climate-Adaptation Knowledge Transfer to Ho Chi Minh City · Nationaal Programma Rotterdam Zuid — A 20-Year Whole-Neighbourhood Programme With Fragile Early Progress · Rotterdam Green Roof Subsidy Programme — Avoided-Cost Stormwater Retention Payments · Rotterdam's Welfare Fraud Risk Model — a 315-Variable Algorithm Suspended After Audit and Investigative Scrutiny · Coderdojo

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Governance, certification & transferability +10 pts 73 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Sustainability -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -13 pts 44 here · 57 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Curator validation -28 pts 45 here · 73 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -32 pts 17 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach -76 pts 0 here · 76 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -89 pts 0 here · 89 average

Score profile vs peers

Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 74
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 48
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Governance, certification & transferability
73 · 64
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Innovation level
65 · 62
Inclusiveness / equity
44 · 43
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Scalability
56 · 62
Sustainability
67 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured results
44 · 57
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 28
Curator validation
45 · 73
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
17 · 48
Evaluation evidence
0 · 49
Documented learning
0 · 74
Demonstrated reach
0 · 76
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 89

Coloured bar: Rotterdam. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

BlueCity — circular-economy incubator (Rotterdam) · 86

Pronto — Port of Rotterdam Authority's AI-Assisted Port Call Optimisation Platform · 73

Gemeente Rotterdam's Municipal Algorithm Register — 31 AI Systems Disclosed Under a Shared European City Standard · 73

Connecting Delta Cities — Rotterdam's Climate-Adaptation Knowledge Transfer to Ho Chi Minh City · 62

Nationaal Programma Rotterdam Zuid — A 20-Year Whole-Neighbourhood Programme With Fragile Early Progress · 48

Rotterdam Green Roof Subsidy Programme — Avoided-Cost Stormwater Retention Payments · 40

Rotterdam's Welfare Fraud Risk Model — a 315-Variable Algorithm Suspended After Audit and Investigative Scrutiny · 33

Coderdojo · 32

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more