evidoria

What works in The Hague

All catalogues · Netherlands profile

23
evaluated practices
59/100
average quality score
5%
strong evidence, of 20 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence +23 pts 71 here · 49 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Demonstrated reach +10 pts 86 here · 76 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +10 pts 63 here · 54 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +9 pts 73 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Innovation level -10 pts 52 here · 62 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Effectiveness -18 pts 50 here · 68 average

Inclusiveness / equity -20 pts 22 here · 43 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Impact on gender equality -71 pts 0 here · 71 average

Curator validation -73 pts 0 here · 73 average

Evaluated outcomes -79 pts 0 here · 79 average

Achievement / evidence -88 pts 0 here · 88 average

Score profile vs peers

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 48
Evaluation evidence
71 · 49
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Demonstrated reach
86 · 76
Transparency, fairness & accountability
63 · 54
Governance, capability & sustainability
73 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured public value
56 · 57
Transferability / replicability
58 · 60
Documented learning
71 · 74
Sustainability (ongoing)
73 · 78
Scalability beyond pilot
56 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Innovation level
52 · 62
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Effectiveness
50 · 68
Inclusiveness / equity
22 · 43
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 28
Efficiency
0 · 33
Impact on gender equality
0 · 71
Curator validation
0 · 73
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 79
Achievement / evidence
0 · 88

Coloured bar: The Hague. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

The Netherlands Court of Audit's Recurring Algorithm Audits — a Government Oversight Model for Public-Sector AI · 93

ACM's Phased Crackdown on Inaccessible E-Commerce Under the European Accessibility Act · 92

Netherlands' Digitoegankelijk Dashboard — A Public Accessibility-Declaration Monitor and 'Forgotten Channels' Sweep · 92

Direct Duidelijk — The Netherlands' Government-Wide Plain-Language Writing Coach Programme · 88

FRAIA — the Netherlands' Fundamental Rights and Algorithms Impact Assessment, Piloted Across 15 Government Algorithms · 87

Overheidsbrede Monitor Generatieve AI — the Netherlands' Government-Wide Tracker of GenAI Use by Civil Servants · 80

LessonUp · 76

NCSC-NL's AI-Assisted Vulnerability Advisories — Three Times Faster Cybersecurity Guidance for the Netherlands' Critical Infrastructure Operators · 73

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more