What works in Vitoria-Gasteiz
All catalogues · Spain profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Vitoria-Gasteiz
Vitoria-Gasteiz implemented a 68-superblock scheme to reduce through-traffic and return public space to pedestrians. In the Sancho el Sabio pilot superblock, CO2 emissions fell 42% (755 to 438 tonnes), pedestrian surface increased from 45% to 74%, and public acceptance scored 7.43/10. After the economic crisis, the city extended superblocks to 17 additional central areas using cheaper, lighter measures such as 30 km/h limits and lane narrowing, rather than full pavement refurbishment, because complete redesign proved too costly to replicate at scale. The evidence comes from one pilot without a control area, so generalization is limited.
Drawn from: Euskadi's Algorithm and AI Systems Catalogue — the Basque Government's Public Register of State AI · Vitoria-Gasteiz Superblocks — A Measured Pilot (Sancho el Sabio) and a Cheaper Rollout After the Funding Squeeze · Euskadi's Catalogue of AI Algorithms — The Basque Country's Public-Sector Algorithm Registry
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Transparency, fairness & accountability +46 pts 100 here · 54 average
Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average
Governance, capability & sustainability +20 pts 83 here · 64 average
Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average
Weaknesses
Evidence of impact / measured public value -13 pts 44 here · 57 average
Scalability beyond pilot -18 pts 44 here · 62 average
Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average
Effectiveness -68 pts 0 here · 68 average
Impact on gender equality -71 pts 0 here · 71 average
Curator validation -73 pts 0 here · 73 average
Evaluated outcomes -79 pts 0 here · 79 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Vitoria-Gasteiz. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Euskadi's Algorithm and AI Systems Catalogue — the Basque Government's Public Register of State AI · 73
Euskadi's Catalogue of AI Algorithms — The Basque Country's Public-Sector Algorithm Registry · 53
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more