evidoria

What works in Armenia

All catalogues

20
evaluated practices
51/100
average quality score
6%
strong evidence, of 16 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Armenia

TUMO Center for Creative Technologies and Armath Engineering Laboratories demonstrate Armenia's investment in free tech and engineering education for youth: TUMO alumni are nearly four times more likely to pursue technology or creative-discipline university degrees (29% vs 8% of comparison peers), while Armath operates 600+ labs reaching roughly 17,200 students across seven countries with ~$24 million invested since 2011. Armenia's National Action Plan to Prevent Gender-Biased Sex Selection shows measurable progress on a longstanding demographic challenge, reducing the sex ratio at birth from 115 boys per 100 girls in 2012 to 108.8 in 2021, though it remains above the biologically normal range of 102–106. Kolba Lab illustrates Armenia's adoption of crowdsourced innovation within government, having incubated 40 start-ups across seven competitions, with 14 documented as generating social or market impact.

Drawn from: TUMO Center for Creative Technologies — Free Extracurricular Tech & Design Education for Teens · Armath Engineering Laboratories · Armenia's National Action Plan to Prevent Gender-Biased Sex Selection · Kolba Lab — Armenia's Government-Embedded Crowdsourced Innovation Lab · Matcheli — Crowdsourced Wheelchair-Accessibility Mapping Co-Designed at Yerevan Mapathons · Armenia's 30% Gender Quota for Parliamentary Candidate Lists (Electoral Code, 2016) · STEP.ai — Armenia's Ministry-Accredited Three-Year AI & Machine Learning Curriculum for Secondary Schools · TUMO Center for Creative Technologies

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Evaluation evidence +22 pts 67 here · 45 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Scalability beyond pilot -8 pts 56 here · 64 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -9 pts 22 here · 31 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -17 pts 58 here · 76 average

Curator validation -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -26 pts 33 here · 59 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -28 pts 22 here · 50 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -28 pts 22 here · 51 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -41 pts 50 here · 91 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Evaluation evidence
67 · 45
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Innovation level
67 · 63
Transparency, fairness & accountability
56 · 54
Inclusiveness / equity
42 · 42
Evidence of learning impact
27 · 28
Governance, capability & sustainability
61 · 64
Transferability / demonstrated replication
56 · 59
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Equity & inclusion
47 · 52
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Scalability beyond pilot
56 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
22 · 31
Sustainability (ongoing)
67 · 78
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
58 · 76
Curator validation
50 · 74
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 59
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
22 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
22 · 51
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
50 · 91
Efficiency
0 · 44

Coloured bar: Armenia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

TUMO Center for Creative Technologies — Free Extracurricular Tech & Design Education for Teens · 100

Armath Engineering Laboratories · 92

Armenia's National Action Plan to Prevent Gender-Biased Sex Selection · 74

Kolba Lab — Armenia's Government-Embedded Crowdsourced Innovation Lab · 71

Matcheli — Crowdsourced Wheelchair-Accessibility Mapping Co-Designed at Yerevan Mapathons · 68

Armenia's 30% Gender Quota for Parliamentary Candidate Lists (Electoral Code, 2016) · 63

STEP.ai — Armenia's Ministry-Accredited Three-Year AI & Machine Learning Curriculum for Secondary Schools · 60

TUMO Center for Creative Technologies · 57

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Armenia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more