evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Matcheli — Crowdsourced Wheelchair-Accessibility Mapping Co-Designed at Yerevan Mapathons

Armenia · Yerevan · See the Armenia profile · See the Yerevan profile

Top 59% 68/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2016, UNDP Armenia's Kolba Lab has incubated Matcheli, an open, crowdsourced map of wheelchair-accessible places built through public mapathons where wheelchair users, parents with prams and cyclists jointly tag accessible sites across Yerevan and beyond.

Matcheli — Crowdsourced Wheelchair-Accessibility Mapping Co-Designed at Yerevan Mapathons

Details

Promoter
Kolba Lab (UNDP Armenia)
Period
2016–present
Keywords
civil society, disability rights, open data, urban mapping

Description

Armenia has long lacked reliable, publicly available information on which buildings, streets and public spaces are actually usable by wheelchair users, leaving people with mobility disabilities to guess or scout locations in person before visiting.

UNDP Armenia's Kolba Lab responded by incubating Matcheli ('accessible' in Armenian), an open web and mobile platform that lets anyone mark a location's wheelchair accessibility. Rather than commissioning a professional survey, Kolba Lab organised public mapathons in central Yerevan that brought together wheelchair users, parents pushing prams and cyclists to add accessible places to the map together — a direct co-design and co-production process with the community the tool serves.

Coverage has grown steadily since the 2016 launch: a national telecoms-news outlet (itel.am) reported roughly 400 mapped places and about 80 active users, while UNDP separately reports over 500 locations in Yerevan alone, with outreach extended to additional Armenian cities. The discrepancy between these figures reflects the absence of a single authoritative usage dashboard rather than any hidden manipulation.

No independent impact evaluation of Matcheli was found, and its user base remains modest for a national platform. Its main evidenced strengths are longevity — nearly a decade of continuous operation — and a genuinely participatory data-collection method, rather than measured outcomes for accessibility-seeking users.

Read the full analysis: https://itel.am/en/news/8383

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful